Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Central Lab, Agriculture Research Center, El Gamaa St., Giza, Egypt; National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Sep;27:317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
The widespread occurrence of microbial pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, has ignited research efforts to discover alternative strategies to combat infections in patients. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT) have been proposed for the inactivation of pathogens. Although PDT and PTT are very promising antipathogenic tools, further effort is needed to determine their real impact on pathogens apart from the effects of individual elements involved in the photodynamic/photothermal processes, i.e., light, photosensitizers (PSs), and nanoparticles. Accordingly, in the current study, toluidine blue O (TBO) and gold nanoparticles (GNP) were used as generators of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hyperthermia in the presence of light, respectively. Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) bacteria were chosen as examples of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Before the bactericidal activity of PDT was assessed, the aggregation of TBO and its effect on the growth of both strains of bacteria were studied. Additionally, E. coli and B. cereus were exposed to a range of doses of 633 nm helium-neon laser light to investigate its effect. In a separate set of experiments, the bactericidal activity of PTT was assessed after the effects of GNP and green light (530 nm) had been assessed. The results showed that PDT and PTT should be considered useful tools for bacterial eradication even when the light, PSs, and nanoparticles are each used at doses safe for bacterial growth. Moreover, different photodynamic responses were observed for E. coli and B. cereus, and light from a 633 nm laser and a 530 nm light-emitting diode (LED) showed disparate responses when applied alone to both bacteria.
微生物病原体(包括多药耐药菌)的广泛存在激发了人们的研究努力,以寻找替代策略来对抗患者的感染。最近,光动力疗法(PDT)和光热疗法(PTT)已被提议用于灭活病原体。尽管 PDT 和 PTT 是非常有前途的抗病原体工具,但需要进一步努力来确定它们对病原体的实际影响,除了光动力/光热过程中涉及的单个元素的影响之外,即光、光敏剂(PS)和纳米颗粒。因此,在当前研究中,甲苯胺蓝 O(TBO)和金纳米颗粒(GNP)分别被用作光存在下产生活性氧(ROS)和热的发生器。大肠杆菌(E. coli)和蜡状芽孢杆菌(B. cereus)分别被选为革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌的代表。在评估 PDT 的杀菌活性之前,研究了 TBO 的聚集及其对两种细菌生长的影响。此外,还对 E. coli 和 B. cereus 进行了一系列 633nm 氦氖激光剂量的照射实验,以研究其对细菌的影响。在另一组实验中,评估了 GNP 和绿光(530nm)的作用后,评估了 PTT 的杀菌活性。结果表明,即使在光、PS 和纳米颗粒的剂量对细菌生长安全的情况下,PDT 和 PTT 也应被视为细菌消除的有用工具。此外,对于 E. coli 和 B. cereus,观察到了不同的光动力反应,并且单独应用于两种细菌的 633nm 激光和 530nm 发光二极管(LED)光显示出不同的反应。