Ward D J, Nutman T B, Zea-Flores G, Portocarrero C, Lujan A, Ottesen E A
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Infect Dis. 1988 Mar;157(3):536-43. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.3.536.
To identify possible immune mechanisms in human onchocerciasis, we compared a group of 12 individuals who had no clinical or parasitological evidence of infection, despite ongoing exposure to the parasite, with a group of 16 individuals from the same area who had active Onchocerca volvulus infection. Despite having less parasite-specific serum antibody, the infection-free ("putatively immune") individuals showed greater lymphocyte responsiveness, especially interleukin-2 (IL-2) production, to O. volvulus antigen (OVA) than did the infected subjects; lymphocyte responses (including IL-2 production) to mitogens and nonparasite antigen in both study groups were equivalent and normal. Our findings define differences in parasite-specific T cell subpopulations between infected and putatively immune subjects that could be a central element in developing or maintaining protective immunity to O. volvulus infection.
为了确定人类盘尾丝虫病中可能的免疫机制,我们将一组12名个体与另一组16名个体进行了比较。前一组个体尽管持续接触寄生虫,但没有感染的临床或寄生虫学证据;后一组个体来自同一地区,患有活动性盘尾丝虫感染。尽管无感染(“假定免疫”)个体的寄生虫特异性血清抗体较少,但与感染个体相比,他们对盘尾丝虫抗原(OVA)表现出更强的淋巴细胞反应性,尤其是白细胞介素-2(IL-2)的产生;两个研究组中对有丝分裂原和非寄生虫抗原的淋巴细胞反应(包括IL-2产生)相当且正常。我们的研究结果确定了感染个体与假定免疫个体之间寄生虫特异性T细胞亚群的差异,这可能是形成或维持对盘尾丝虫感染的保护性免疫的核心要素。