Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Mar;46(3):408-423. doi: 10.1177/0146167219858641. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
The aim of this research was to explore the predictors of gullibility and to develop a self-report measure of the construct. In Studies 1 to 3, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on a large pool of items resulting in a 12-item scale with two factors: Persuadability and Insensitivity to cues of untrustworthiness. Study 4 confirmed the criterion validity of the scale using two distinct samples: scam victims and members of the Skeptics Society. Study 5 demonstrated positive relationships between gullibility and the self-reported persuasiveness of, and likelihood of responding to, unsolicited emails. Throughout the article, analyses of a variety of measures expected to converge with the scale provided evidence for its construct validity. Overall, these studies demonstrate that the construct of gullibility is distinct from trust, negatively related to social intelligence, and that the Gullibility Scale is a reliable and valid measure of gullibility.
本研究旨在探讨轻信的预测因素,并开发一种轻信结构的自我报告测量方法。在研究 1 至 3 中,对大量项目进行了探索性和验证性因素分析,得出了一个由 12 个项目组成的量表,具有两个因素:说服力和对不可信线索的不敏感。研究 4 使用两个不同的样本证实了量表的效标效度:骗局受害者和怀疑论者协会的成员。研究 5 证明了轻信与自我报告的说服力、对不请自来的电子邮件做出反应的可能性之间存在正相关关系。在整篇文章中,对各种与量表预期相符的测量方法的分析为其结构有效性提供了证据。总的来说,这些研究表明,轻信的结构与信任不同,与社会智能呈负相关,轻信量表是一种可靠和有效的轻信测量方法。