Department of Orthopedics, Regional Hospital Randers, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930, Randers, Denmark.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 29;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y.
Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common in elderly patients, who present at the Emergency Department. Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates is widely prevalent despite the lack of evidence proving its superiority to conservative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilization. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether conservative treatment is superior to volar plating in terms of number of complications and results in a comparable or superior functional outcome in patients ≥65 years.
In this single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial, patients ≥65 years with distal radius fractures will be invited to participate. A total of 50 patients per treatment arm is required to provide 80% statistical power at a 5% alpha level assuming a difference of 20% in complication rate between operatively and conservatively treated patients. Primary outcome measures will be complication rate, Quick DASH score (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PRWE (Patient rated Wrist evaluation), and range of motion of the wrist. Secondary outcome measures will be grip strength, pinch gauge, pain, use of pain medication EQ5D score (European Quality of life - 5 dimensions), standardized radiographs. One year of follow-up is planned with data collection at the day of injury, after 2 weeks, after 5 weeks, after 6 months, and after 12 months. An intention-totreat and per-protocol analysis will be performed.
This prospective trial helps to clarify the best treatment strategy for displaced DRF patients ≥65 years.
This trial is approved by the Danish Scientific Ethical Committee (ID: 1-10-72-420-17) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT03716661 ).
桡骨远端骨折(DRF)在老年患者中非常常见,他们会到急诊科就诊。尽管缺乏证据证明切开复位内固定使用掌侧锁定钢板比闭合复位和石膏固定更具优势,但手术治疗仍广泛应用。本研究旨在探讨保守治疗在并发症数量和功能结果方面是否优于掌侧钢板固定,对于≥65 岁的患者。
在这项单中心、单盲随机对照试验中,将邀请≥65 岁的桡骨远端骨折患者参加。假设手术和保守治疗患者的并发症发生率差异为 20%,则每个治疗组需要 50 名患者,以在 5%的α水平和 80%的统计效力下提供结果。主要结局指标为并发症发生率、快速 DASH 评分(快速残疾的手臂、肩膀和手)、PRWE(患者手腕评估)和手腕活动范围。次要结局指标为握力、捏力计、疼痛、止痛药使用、EQ5D 评分(欧洲生活质量-5 维度)、标准化 X 线片。计划进行 1 年的随访,数据收集在受伤当天、2 周后、5 周后、6 个月后和 12 个月后进行。将进行意向治疗和方案分析。
这项前瞻性试验有助于阐明治疗≥65 岁移位 DRF 患者的最佳治疗策略。
该试验得到丹麦科学伦理委员会的批准(ID:1-10-72-420-17),并在 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册(试验注册号:NCT03716661)。