• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项单中心、单盲随机对照临床试验方案,旨在研究对于 65 岁以上不稳定桡骨远端骨折患者,掌侧钢板固定与保守治疗的疗效比较。

A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Regional Hospital Randers, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930, Randers, Denmark.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 29;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y
PMID:31253145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6599306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are very common in elderly patients, who present at the Emergency Department. Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using volar locking plates is widely prevalent despite the lack of evidence proving its superiority to conservative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilization. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether conservative treatment is superior to volar plating in terms of number of complications and results in a comparable or superior functional outcome in patients ≥65 years.

METHODS

In this single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial, patients ≥65 years with distal radius fractures will be invited to participate. A total of 50 patients per treatment arm is required to provide 80% statistical power at a 5% alpha level assuming a difference of 20% in complication rate between operatively and conservatively treated patients. Primary outcome measures will be complication rate, Quick DASH score (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), PRWE (Patient rated Wrist evaluation), and range of motion of the wrist. Secondary outcome measures will be grip strength, pinch gauge, pain, use of pain medication EQ5D score (European Quality of life - 5 dimensions), standardized radiographs. One year of follow-up is planned with data collection at the day of injury, after 2 weeks, after 5 weeks, after 6 months, and after 12 months. An intention-totreat and per-protocol analysis will be performed.

DISCUSSION

This prospective trial helps to clarify the best treatment strategy for displaced DRF patients ≥65 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is approved by the Danish Scientific Ethical Committee (ID: 1-10-72-420-17) and registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (Trial registration number NCT03716661 ).

摘要

背景

桡骨远端骨折(DRF)在老年患者中非常常见,他们会到急诊科就诊。尽管缺乏证据证明切开复位内固定使用掌侧锁定钢板比闭合复位和石膏固定更具优势,但手术治疗仍广泛应用。本研究旨在探讨保守治疗在并发症数量和功能结果方面是否优于掌侧钢板固定,对于≥65 岁的患者。

方法

在这项单中心、单盲随机对照试验中,将邀请≥65 岁的桡骨远端骨折患者参加。假设手术和保守治疗患者的并发症发生率差异为 20%,则每个治疗组需要 50 名患者,以在 5%的α水平和 80%的统计效力下提供结果。主要结局指标为并发症发生率、快速 DASH 评分(快速残疾的手臂、肩膀和手)、PRWE(患者手腕评估)和手腕活动范围。次要结局指标为握力、捏力计、疼痛、止痛药使用、EQ5D 评分(欧洲生活质量-5 维度)、标准化 X 线片。计划进行 1 年的随访,数据收集在受伤当天、2 周后、5 周后、6 个月后和 12 个月后进行。将进行意向治疗和方案分析。

讨论

这项前瞻性试验有助于阐明治疗≥65 岁移位 DRF 患者的最佳治疗策略。

试验注册

该试验得到丹麦科学伦理委员会的批准(ID:1-10-72-420-17),并在 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册(试验注册号:NCT03716661)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/7ca2b464371f/12891_2019_2677_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/bca82fa6f3fe/12891_2019_2677_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/cf9c182f7b6d/12891_2019_2677_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/7ca2b464371f/12891_2019_2677_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/bca82fa6f3fe/12891_2019_2677_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/cf9c182f7b6d/12891_2019_2677_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf6b/6599306/7ca2b464371f/12891_2019_2677_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A protocol for a single-center, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial investigating volar plating versus conservative treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years.一项单中心、单盲随机对照临床试验方案,旨在研究对于 65 岁以上不稳定桡骨远端骨折患者,掌侧钢板固定与保守治疗的疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 29;20(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2677-y.
2
Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures, a randomized controlled trial.手术与保守治疗 A 型桡骨远端骨折患者的随机对照试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 19;15:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-90.
3
Internal plate fixation versus plaster in displaced complete articular distal radius fractures, a randomised controlled trial.移位的桡骨远端全关节骨折的钢板内固定与石膏固定:一项随机对照试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 9;17:68. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0925-y.
4
Cast immobilization versus volar locking plate fixation of AO type C distal radial fractures in patients aged 60 years and older.60岁及以上患者桡骨远端AO C型骨折的石膏固定与掌侧锁定钢板固定对比
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Jan;53(1):15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
5
Are Volar Locking Plates Superior to Percutaneous K-wires for Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-analysis.对于桡骨远端骨折,掌侧锁定钢板是否优于经皮克氏针?一项Meta分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):3017-27. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4347-1. Epub 2015 May 16.
6
POWIFF- Prospective study of wrist internal fixation of fracture: A protocol for a single centre, superiority, randomised controlled trial to study the efficacy of the VRP (2.0) distal radius plate (Austofix) versus the VA-LCP (Depuy-Synthes) for distal radius fractures.腕部骨折内固定前瞻性研究:一项单中心、优效性、随机对照试验方案,旨在研究VRP(2.0)桡骨远端钢板(Austofix)与VA-LCP(Depuy-Synthes)治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 30;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2052-4.
7
Intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients: a randomized prospective study of casting versus volar plating.老年患者桡骨远端关节内骨折:石膏固定与掌侧钢板固定的随机前瞻性研究
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Feb;43(2):142-147. doi: 10.1177/1753193417727139. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older.一项前瞻性随机试验比较了非手术治疗与掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗 65 岁及以上患者移位和不稳定的桡骨远端骨折的效果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):2146-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01597.
9
Non-operative treatment or volar locking plate fixation for dorsally displaced distal radius fractures in patients over 70 years - a three year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.70 岁以上背侧移位桡骨远端骨折患者的非手术治疗或掌侧锁定钢板固定:一项随机对照试验的三年随访结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 12;23(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05394-7.
10
Functional outcome and complications after volar plating for dorsally displaced, unstable fractures of the distal radius.掌侧钢板固定治疗桡骨远端背侧移位不稳定骨折后的功能结果及并发症
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Mar;31(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis and Functional Outcomes After Volar Plating vs. Casting of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up of the VOLCON Randomized Controlled Trial.掌侧钢板固定与石膏固定治疗不稳定桡骨远端骨折后的创伤后骨关节炎及功能结局:VOLCON随机对照试验至少2年的随访
J Clin Med. 2025 May 28;14(11):3766. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113766.
2
Comparison of Bone Mineral Density and Treatment Initiation Among Treatment-Naive Post-menopausal Women With and Without Distal Radius Fracture: A Case-Control Study From Southern Europe.无桡骨远端骨折与有桡骨远端骨折的初治绝经后女性骨密度及治疗起始情况的比较:一项来自南欧的病例对照研究
Cureus. 2025 Apr 17;17(4):e82414. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82414. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes after a distal radius fracture in adults: a 3-4 years follow-up.成人桡骨远端骨折患者报告的结局:3-4 年随访。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Apr;90(2):129-134. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1568098. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
Volar plating of distal radius fractures does not restore the anatomy.桡骨远端骨折的掌侧钢板固定无法恢复解剖结构。
Dan Med J. 2018 Aug;65(8).
3
Complications of volar locking plating of distal radius fractures in 576 patients with 3.2 years follow-up.576例桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板固定患者的并发症,随访3.2年。
Posttraumatic arthritis and functional outcomes of nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures after 3 years.
创伤后关节炎与非手术治疗桡骨远端骨折 3 年后的功能结局。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 30;13(1):21102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48630-3.
4
Volar Locking Plating Compared to Conservative Treatment in Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients (>60 years old): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.老年患者(>60岁)桡骨远端骨折中掌侧锁定钢板与保守治疗的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 May 18;5(5):589-594. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.04.009. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Prospective Evaluation of Two Cohorts of Non-Operatively Treated Patients with Displaced vs. Minimally and Non-Displaced Distal Radius Fractures.两组非手术治疗的桡骨远端移位骨折与轻度及无移位骨折患者的前瞻性评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):2076. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052076.
6
VOLCON: a randomized controlled trial investigating complications and functional outcome of volar plating vs casting of unstable distal radius fractures in patients older than 65 years.VOLCON:一项随机对照试验,研究65岁以上患者不稳定型桡骨远端骨折掌侧钢板固定与石膏固定的并发症及功能结果。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Nov 28;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00673-4.
7
Objective Outcome Measures Continue to Improve from 6 to 12 Months after Conservatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly-A Prospective Evaluation of 50 Patients.目的:对50例老年桡骨远端骨折保守治疗患者进行前瞻性评估,观察其在6至12个月期间客观预后指标持续改善情况。
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 22;10(9):1831. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091831.
8
A Novel Instant 3-Dimensional Printing System for Postoperative Fracture Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study.一种用于术后骨折患者的新型即时三维打印系统:一项比较队列研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Jan 1;27:e928240. doi: 10.12659/MSM.928240.
9
The Effect of a PEEK Material-Based External Fixator in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures with Non-Transarticular External Fixation.PEEK 材料外固定架治疗非关节外固定桡骨远端骨折的效果。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):90-97. doi: 10.1111/os.12837. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
10
Volar Locked Plating Versus Closed Reduction and Casting for Acute, Displaced Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.掌侧锁定钢板与闭合复位石膏固定治疗老年移位性桡骨远端骨折的随机对照试验的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jul 15;102(14):1280-1288. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01442.
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1104-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
4
Validation of the Danish version of the Quick-Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire.《手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾问卷》丹麦语版本的验证
Dan Med J. 2016 Dec;63(12).
5
[Treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly].[老年桡骨远端骨折的治疗]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2015 Aug 17;177(34).
6
Incidence and reasons for hardware removal following operative fixation of distal radius fractures.桡骨远端骨折手术固定后内固定取出的发生率及原因
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Mar;40(3):505-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
Complication rates and reduction potential of palmar versus dorsal locking plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of distal radius fractures.掌侧与背侧锁定钢板接骨术治疗桡骨远端骨折的并发症发生率及降低潜力
J Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Dec;15(4):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0306-y. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
8
Complications associated with operative versus nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older.65岁及以上患者桡骨远端骨折手术治疗与非手术治疗相关的并发症。
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jul;39(7):1280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH).手臂、肩和手功能障碍(DASH)及其简化版(QuickDASH)的最小临床重要差异。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;44(1):30-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4893. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
10
Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA).欧盟的骨质疏松症:医疗管理、流行病学和经济负担。这份报告是与国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)和欧洲制药工业协会联合会(EFPIA)合作编写的。
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. Epub 2013 Oct 11.