Suppr超能文献

不同呼吸监测技术对实时磁共振成像评估的呼吸相关性每搏量测量的影响。

Impact of different respiratory monitoring techniques on respiration-dependent stroke-volume measurements assessed by real-time magnetic resonance imaging.

机构信息

Institut für Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Molekulare Bildgebung, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Georgstraße 11, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

Institute of Medical Engineering, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Z Med Phys. 2019 Dec;29(4):349-358. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Quantitative blood flow measurements in thoracic vessels are dependent on the patient's respiration due to intrathoracic pressure changes. Several registration techniques for tracing the patient's breathing curve exist exploiting various physiological characteristics. In the presented study two registration techniques were investigated to estimate the time-shift between the associated respiration curves and the impact on respiration-dependent hemodynamic measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using flow-sensitive real-time magnetic resonance imaging (3.0T, temporal resolution=24-26ms) data were acquired during a 13s time-interval under normal physiological (no) and forced breathing (fo) in the ascending aorta (AAo) and inferior vena cava (IVC). Breathing curves were obtained by using (1) an abdominal placed respiratory belt (=standard, RB) and (2) by applying a self-developed edge-detection software (ED). Respiration curves were divided into four intervals (end-expiration, inspiration, end-inspiration and expiration) to generate respiration-dependent stroke volumes (SVs) and cardiac indices (CIs). Data were available from 12 healthy controls (16.2±8.8yrs) and 18 Fontan-patients (18.6±7.1yrs).

RESULTS

Respiration curves acquired with RB differs from and are shifted compared to those obtained by ED (controls: average shift=207±168ms, Fontan-patients: average shift=106±235ms). This time-shift results in statistical significant differences in cardiac indices CI in controls (ΔCI: expiration: +0.16L/min/m, p=0.018), in CI in Fontan-patients (ΔCI: end-expiration: +0.94L/min/m, p=0.002 and end-inspiration: -1.04L/min/m, p=0.017) and in CI in Fontan-patients (ΔCI: end-expiration: +1.31L/min/m, p=0.009; inspiration: -2.26L/min/m, p=0.008 and end-inspiration: -1.87L/min/m, p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

A time-shift between both applied respiratory tracking techniques was observed resulting in significant differences in respiration-dependent CIs, which could influence the clinical decision-making.

摘要

目的

由于胸腔内压力变化,胸部血管的定量血流测量依赖于患者的呼吸。存在几种利用各种生理特征来追踪患者呼吸曲线的配准技术。在本研究中,研究了两种配准技术,以估计相关呼吸曲线之间的时移以及对呼吸依赖性血液动力学测量的影响。

材料和方法

使用流量敏感的实时磁共振成像(3.0T,时间分辨率=24-26ms)数据,在正常生理(无)和强制呼吸(fo)下,在升主动脉(AAo)和下腔静脉(IVC)中采集 13 秒的时间间隔。通过使用(1)腹部放置的呼吸带(=标准,RB)和(2)应用自行开发的边缘检测软件(ED)获得呼吸曲线。将呼吸曲线分为四个区间(呼气末期、吸气、吸气末期和呼气),以生成呼吸依赖性的每搏量(SV)和心指数(CI)。数据来自 12 名健康对照者(16.2±8.8 岁)和 18 名 Fontan 患者(18.6±7.1 岁)。

结果

与 ED 获得的呼吸曲线相比,RB 获得的呼吸曲线不同且存在偏移(对照:平均偏移=207±168ms,Fontan 患者:平均偏移=106±235ms)。该时移导致对照组心指数 CI 的统计学显著差异(ΔCI:呼气:+0.16L/min/m,p=0.018),Fontan 患者 CI 的统计学显著差异(ΔCI:呼气末期:+0.94L/min/m,p=0.002 和吸气末期:-1.04L/min/m,p=0.017)和 Fontan 患者 CI 的统计学显著差异(ΔCI:呼气末期:+1.31L/min/m,p=0.009;吸气:-2.26L/min/m,p=0.008 和吸气末期:-1.87L/min/m,p=0.029)。

结论

观察到两种应用的呼吸跟踪技术之间存在时移,导致呼吸依赖性 CI 存在显著差异,这可能会影响临床决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验