Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Copenhagen, and Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Sep;72(9):1331-1338. doi: 10.1002/acr.24019.
To explore the patients' views of the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes as part of routine care in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
We conducted a qualitative focus group study based on interviews in each of the 5 geographical regions of Denmark. The analysis was based on content analysis. Four patient research partners were involved in the study.
In total, 32 adult patients (21 female) with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 21), psoriatic arthritis (n = 6), and axial spondyloarthritis (n = 5) participated. The mean age was 60 years (range 32-80 years). Five themes were derived from the analysis: 1) a need for information about why the data are collected, reflecting patients' uncertainty as to whether the collection of patient-reported outcomes primarily served to monitor their own disease, to save money, or to gather data for research purposes; 2) inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in the consultation, encompassing patients' expectations of active use of the patient-reported outcomes data during talks with rheumatologists or nurses; 3) reflections on how to respond to the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to obtain high quality data, referring to patients' concerns about how to respond "correctly" and about issues that could affect their responses; 4) addressing patient-reported outcomes to the individual's challenges, reflecting the need for a more individualized approach; and 5) possibilities for improvement in the use of patient-reported outcomes, referring to patients' ideas for the future use of patient-reported outcomes.
Information and dialogue regarding the purpose of patient-reported outcomes collection, how to respond to PROMs correctly, and inclusion of the patient-reported outcomes data in the consultation are of importance to patients with inflammatory arthritis who routinely complete patient-reported outcomes.
探讨炎症性关节炎患者对将患者报告结局纳入常规护理进行采集和使用的看法。
我们在丹麦的 5 个地理区域分别进行了基于访谈的定性焦点小组研究。分析基于内容分析。有 4 名患者研究合作伙伴参与了这项研究。
共有 32 名成年患者(21 名女性)参加了这项研究,其中类风湿关节炎(n = 21)、银屑病关节炎(n = 6)和中轴型脊柱关节炎(n = 5)。平均年龄为 60 岁(范围 32-80 岁)。分析得出了 5 个主题:1)需要了解为什么要收集数据,这反映了患者不确定数据的收集主要是为了监测自己的疾病、节省资金还是为了研究目的收集数据;2)将患者报告结局纳入咨询,包括患者期望在与风湿病医生或护士的交谈中积极使用患者报告结局数据;3)反思如何对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)做出回应以获得高质量的数据,这涉及到患者对如何“正确”回应以及可能影响他们回应的问题的担忧;4)针对患者的挑战来处理患者报告结局,反映出需要采取更个体化的方法;5)改善患者报告结局使用的可能性,涉及到患者对未来使用患者报告结局的想法。
为炎症性关节炎患者提供有关患者报告结局采集目的、如何正确回应 PROMs 以及将患者报告结局数据纳入咨询的信息和对话非常重要,这有助于患者常规完成患者报告结局。