• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期与长期心血管不良结局:一项简单的荟萃分析

Short-Term Versus Long-Term Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Simple Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lu Hongtao, Tang Bing, Zhou Yanhua, Xu Chenhong, Bundhun Pravesh Kumar, Tang Zhangui, Bao Hong

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

Department of Hematology, Jingzhou First People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1487-1497. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0656-9. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-019-0656-9
PMID:31256352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6612339/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major health issue, especially in patients with coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with insulin-treated T2DM (ITDM) have worse outcomes than those with non-insulin-treated T2DM. Very few studies have compared short-term to long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on insulin therapy. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we systematically compared short-term to long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in a population of patients with ITDM following PCI.

METHODS

We searched for English-language publications focusing on PCI in patients with ITDM using specific search terms/phrases. All the participants accepted for inclusion in this meta-analysis were treated with a drug-eluting stent. Post-intervention adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed during short-term and long-term follow-up periods were assessed and compared. Statistical analysis was carried out using the popular RevMan 5.3 software. Odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Six studies comprising 1568 participants with ITDM in total were included in this simple meta-analysis. Patient enrollment periods varied but enrollment occurred during the years 1993-2012. When a fixed-effects statistical model was used, post-PCI adverse cardiovascular outcomes-such as major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (OR 3.33, 95% CI 2.64-4.21; P = 0.00001), all-cause mortality (OR 5.73, 95% CI 3.37-9.73; P = 0.00001), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.05-2.07; P = 0.02), and repeated revascularization (OR 4.78, 95% CI 3.29-6.94; P = 0.00001)-were found to be significantly more likely during the long-term follow-up period. A similar result was observed with a random-effects statistical model.

CONCLUSION

Adverse cardiovascular outcomes post PCI were significantly more likely during the long-term follow-up period than during the short-term follow-up period in these patients with T2DM on insulin therapy. This hypothesis requires confirmation via new comparative trials that consider short-term and long-term follow-up periods.

摘要

引言

2型糖尿病(T2DM)是一个主要的健康问题,尤其是在合并冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中。接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(ITDM)患者的预后比未接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者更差。很少有研究比较胰岛素治疗患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后短期与长期的不良心血管结局。因此,在这项荟萃分析中,我们系统地比较了ITDM患者PCI后短期与长期的不良心血管结局。

方法

我们使用特定的搜索词/短语搜索聚焦于ITDM患者PCI的英文出版物。所有纳入本荟萃分析的参与者均接受药物洗脱支架治疗。评估并比较短期和长期随访期间观察到的干预后不良心血管结局。使用流行的RevMan 5.3软件进行统计分析。计算了具有95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)。

结果

本简单荟萃分析纳入了6项研究,共计1568例ITDM患者。患者入组时间各不相同,但入组时间为1993年至2012年。当使用固定效应统计模型时,PCI后不良心血管结局,如主要不良心脏事件(MACE)(OR 3.33,95%CI 2.64 - 4.21;P = 0.00001)、全因死亡率(OR 5.73,95%CI 3.37 - 9.73;P = 0.00001)、心肌梗死(MI)(OR 1.47,95%CI 1.05 - 2.07;P = 0.02)和再次血运重建(OR 4.78,95%CI 3.29 - 6.94;P = 0.00001),在长期随访期间被发现显著更有可能发生。随机效应统计模型也观察到了类似结果。

结论

在这些接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,PCI后不良心血管结局在长期随访期间比短期随访期间显著更有可能发生。这一假设需要通过考虑短期和长期随访期的新的对比试验来证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/796c1ae174c0/13300_2019_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/2ca5af65e63b/13300_2019_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/f203cf9d1bb9/13300_2019_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/a969741a8091/13300_2019_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/796c1ae174c0/13300_2019_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/2ca5af65e63b/13300_2019_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/f203cf9d1bb9/13300_2019_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/a969741a8091/13300_2019_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9490/6612339/796c1ae174c0/13300_2019_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-Term Versus Long-Term Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Simple Meta-Analysis.胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期与长期心血管不良结局:一项简单的荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1487-1497. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0656-9. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
2
Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes mellitus and patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者与非2型糖尿病患者的不良临床结局比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0422-0.
3
Cardiac Versus Non-Cardiac Related Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心脏与非心脏相关死亡率的Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1335-1345. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0444-y. Epub 2018 May 19.
4
In-hospital, short-term and long-term adverse clinical outcomes observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus vs non-diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis including 139,774 patients.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后2型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的院内、短期和长期不良临床结局:一项纳入139,774例患者的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14669. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014669.
5
Early (≤ 30 Days), Late (31-360 Days) and Very Late (> 360 Days) Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Insulin-Treated versus Non-Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的早期(≤30天)、晚期(31 - 360天)和极晚期(>360天)支架内血栓形成:一项荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1113-1124. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0425-1. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Short- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in insulin-treated versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的短期和长期心血管结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian Heart J. 2022 Jan-Feb;74(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Comparing the Clinical Outcomes Between Insulin-treated and Non-insulin-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术后胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者临床结局比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e3006. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003006.
8
Adverse cardiovascular outcomes between insulin-treated and non-insulin treated diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者的不良心血管结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Oct 7;14:135. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0300-6.
9
Are women with type 2 diabetes mellitus more susceptible to cardiovascular complications following coronary angioplasty?: a meta-analysis.2型糖尿病女性在冠状动脉血管成形术后是否更容易发生心血管并发症?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jul 27;17(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0645-8.
10
Cardiovascular Outcomes Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停合并2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心血管结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Aug;11(8):1795-1806. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00870-6. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors of premature coronary artery disease in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗早发性冠心病的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2019 Jul;49(7):e13124. doi: 10.1111/eci.13124. Epub 2019 May 18.
2
Clinical Overview of Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus as Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation and Sudden Cardiac Death.肥胖与糖尿病作为心房颤动和心源性猝死危险因素的临床概述
Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 7;9:1847. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01847. eCollection 2018.
3
One quarter of total myocardial infarctions are silent manifestation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
四分之一的 2 型糖尿病患者的心肌梗死为无症状表现。
J Cardiol. 2019 Jan;73(1):33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Cardiac Versus Non-Cardiac Related Mortality Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心脏与非心脏相关死亡率的Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1335-1345. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0444-y. Epub 2018 May 19.
5
Early (≤ 30 Days), Late (31-360 Days) and Very Late (> 360 Days) Stent Thrombosis in Patients with Insulin-Treated versus Non-Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的早期(≤30天)、晚期(31 - 360天)和极晚期(>360天)支架内血栓形成:一项荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1113-1124. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0425-1. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Insulin-Treated and Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus: Secondary Analysis of the TUXEDO Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴或不伴胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者:TUXEDO 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;1(3):266-73. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0305.
7
Long-term outcome of early percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BASE ACS trial.糖尿病急性冠状动脉综合征患者早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期预后:来自BASE ACS试验的见解
Ann Med. 2016 Aug;48(5):376-83. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1186829. Epub 2016 May 29.
8
Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials.胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:6项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Jan 6;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0323-z.
9
Adverse cardiovascular outcomes between insulin-treated and non-insulin treated diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后胰岛素治疗与非胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者的不良心血管结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Oct 7;14:135. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0300-6.
10
Long-term outcome of PCI versus CABG in insulin and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients: results from the FREEDOM trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗糖尿病患者的长期疗效比较:来自 FREEDOM 试验的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 23;64(12):1189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1182.