Rostalski Sophie-Marie, Amado Catarina, Kovács Gyula
Department of Biological Psychology and Cognitive Neurosciences, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Department of Computer Science, Experimental Cognitive Science Research Group, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 14;10:1348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01348. eCollection 2019.
Repetition suppression (RS), the relative lower neural response magnitude to repeated as compared to non-repeated stimuli, is often explained within the predictive coding framework. According to this theory, precise predictions (priors) together with less precise sensory evidences lead to decisions that are determined largely by the predictions and the other way around. In other words, the prediction error, namely the magnitude of RS, should depend on the precision of predictions and sensory inputs. In the current study, we aimed at testing this idea by manipulating the clarity and thereby the precision of the incoming sensory data by adding noise to the images. This resulted in an fMRI adaptation design with repeated or alternating trials showing clear or noisy face stimuli. Our results show a noise effect on the activity in the fusiform face area (FFA), namely less activation for noisy than for clear trials, which supports previous findings. No such effects could be found in OFA or LO. Data also showed reliable RS in the FFA (bilateral) and unilaterally in OFA (right) and LO (left). Interestingly, the noise added to the stimuli did not affect the magnitude of RS in any of the tested cortical areas. This suggests that the clarity of the sensory input is not crucial in determining the magnitude of RS.
重复抑制(RS),即与非重复刺激相比,对重复刺激的神经反应幅度相对较低,通常在预测编码框架内得到解释。根据这一理论,精确的预测(先验)与不太精确的感官证据共同导致决策,这些决策在很大程度上由预测决定,反之亦然。换句话说,预测误差,即RS的幅度,应该取决于预测和感官输入的精度。在当前的研究中,我们旨在通过向图像中添加噪声来操纵传入感官数据的清晰度,从而操纵其精度,以此来检验这一观点。这产生了一种功能磁共振成像适应设计,其中重复或交替试验呈现清晰或有噪声的面部刺激。我们的结果显示了噪声对梭状回面孔区(FFA)活动的影响,即与清晰试验相比,有噪声试验的激活程度更低,这支持了先前的研究结果。在枕颞面孔区(OFA)或外侧枕叶(LO)未发现此类影响。数据还显示,FFA(双侧)以及OFA(右侧)和LO(左侧)单侧存在可靠的重复抑制。有趣的是,添加到刺激中的噪声并未影响任何测试皮层区域的重复抑制幅度。这表明感官输入的清晰度在决定重复抑制幅度方面并非至关重要。