Institute for Public Health and Nursing, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jan 1;54(1):36-48. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz023.
Socioeconomic differences in health-related behaviors are a major cause of health inequalities. However, the mechanisms (mediation/moderation) by which socioeconomic status (SES) affects health behavior are a topic of ongoing debate.
Current research on SES as moderator of the health cognitions-health behavior relation is inconsistent. Previous studies are limited by diverse operationalizations of SES and health behaviors, demographically narrow samples, and between-person designs addressing within-person processes. This paper presents two studies addressing these shortcomings in a within-person multibehavior framework using hierarchical linear models.
Two online studies, one cross-sectional and one 4 week longitudinal, assessed 1,005 (Study 1; Amazon MTurk; USA only) and 1,273 participants (Study 2; Prolific; international). Self-reports of multiple SES indicators (education, income, occupation status; ZIP code in Study 1), health cognitions (from the theory of planned behavior), and measures of six health behaviors were taken. Multilevel models with cross-level interactions tested whether the within-person relationships between health cognitions and behaviors differed by between-person SES.
Education significantly moderated intention-behavior and attitude-behavior relationships in both studies, with more educated individuals showing stronger positive relationships. In addition, ZIP-level SES (Study 1) moderated attitude-behavior effects such that these relationships were stronger in participants living in areas with higher SES.
Education appears to be an important resource for the translation of intentions and attitudes into behavior. Other SES indicators showed less consistent effects. This has implications for interventions aiming at increasing intentions to change health behaviors, as some interventions might inadvertently increase health inequalities.
与健康相关的行为方面的社会经济差异是健康不平等的主要原因。然而,社会经济地位(SES)影响健康行为的机制(中介/调节)仍在争论之中。
当前关于 SES 作为健康认知与健康行为关系的调节因素的研究结果并不一致。以往的研究存在 SES 和健康行为的操作多样化、人口统计学上样本狭窄以及基于个体的设计等局限性,无法解决个体内部的过程。本研究采用分层线性模型,在个体多行为框架内,通过两项研究解决了这些局限性。
两项在线研究,一项是横断面研究,另一项是 4 周纵向研究,共评估了 1005 名(研究 1;亚马逊土耳其机器人;仅限美国)和 1273 名参与者(研究 2; prolific;国际)。使用自我报告的多种 SES 指标(教育程度、收入、职业状况;研究 1 中的邮政编码)、健康认知(来自计划行为理论)以及六项健康行为的测量来进行评估。跨水平交互的多层模型检验了健康认知和行为之间的个体内关系是否因个体间 SES 而异。
在两项研究中,教育程度显著调节了意图-行为和态度-行为的关系,受教育程度较高的个体表现出更强的正相关关系。此外,在研究 1 中,ZIP 水平 SES (SES)调节了态度-行为的影响,使得生活在 SES 较高地区的参与者的这些关系更强。
教育似乎是将意图和态度转化为行为的重要资源。其他 SES 指标的影响则不那么一致。这对旨在提高改变健康行为的意图的干预措施具有影响,因为一些干预措施可能会无意中加剧健康不平等。