Mishra Shivangi, Sinha Renu, Ray Bikash Ranjan, Pandey Ravinder Kumar, Darlong Vanlal, Punj Jyotsna
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;63(6):485-490. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_237_19.
In children, entropy-guided titration of isoflurane and sevoflurane leads to faster recovery after anaesthesia. However, role of entropy in recovery following desflurane anaesthesia is not known. Hence, we compared laryngeal mask airway (LMA) removal time and desflurane consumption with entropy and minimal alveolar concentration-guided titration in children given low-flow desflurane anaesthesia.
After ethics committee approval and parental consent, 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II children, age 2-14 years, undergoing elective ophthalmic surgery were randomised into entropy and minimal alveolar concentration-guided groups. After LMA insertion, anaesthesia was maintained using oxygen, air (FiO 0.5) and desflurane using low fresh gas flow of 0.75 L/min. In the entropy-guided group, desflurane was titrated to maintain state entropy between 40 and 60. In the minimal alveolar concentration-guided group, desflurane was titrated to maintain a minimal alveolar concentration between 1 and 1.3. We recorded LMA removal time (from switching off desflurane at the end of surgery till removal of LMA), haemodynamic parameters, uptake and consumption of desflurane between the groups.
LMA removal time was significantly decreased in the entropy-guided group in comparison to the minimal alveolar concentration-guided group (4.34 ± 2.03 vs 8.8 ± 2.33 min) ( < 0.0001). Consumption of desflurane was significantly less in the entropy-guided group compared with the minimal alveolar concentration-guided group (18.7 ± 5.07 vs 25.3 ± 8.11 mL) ( < 0.0001).
Entropy-guided low-flow desflurane anaesthesia is associated with faster LMA removal and reduced consumption of desflurane in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery.
在儿童中,熵值引导下的异氟烷和七氟烷滴定可使麻醉后恢复更快。然而,熵值在地氟烷麻醉后恢复过程中的作用尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了在接受低流量地氟烷麻醉的儿童中,使用熵值引导滴定与最低肺泡浓度引导滴定法时喉罩气道(LMA)拔除时间和地氟烷消耗量。
经伦理委员会批准并获得家长同意后,将80名年龄在2至14岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I-II级、接受择期眼科手术的儿童随机分为熵值引导组和最低肺泡浓度引导组。插入喉罩后,使用氧气、空气(FiO₂ 0.5)和地氟烷以0.75 L/min的低新鲜气体流量维持麻醉。在熵值引导组中,滴定地氟烷以维持状态熵在40至60之间。在最低肺泡浓度引导组中,滴定地氟烷以维持最低肺泡浓度在1至1.3之间。我们记录了两组的LMA拔除时间(从手术结束时关闭地氟烷至拔除LMA)、血流动力学参数、地氟烷的摄取和消耗量。
与最低肺泡浓度引导组相比,熵值引导组的LMA拔除时间显著缩短(4.34 ± 2.03分钟 vs 8.8 ± 2.33分钟)(P < 0.0001)。与最低肺泡浓度引导组相比,熵值引导组的地氟烷消耗量显著减少(18.7 ± 5.07毫升 vs 25.3 ± 8.11毫升)(P < 0.0001)。
熵值引导下的低流量地氟烷麻醉与接受眼科手术儿童的LMA拔除更快及地氟烷消耗量减少相关。