• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化自适应测验中平均测验重叠率的渐近分布。

The Asymptotic Distribution of Average Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

机构信息

Graduate Management Admission Council™ (GMAC™), 11921 Freedom Drive, Suite 300, Reston, VA , 20190, USA.

Purdue University, 100 N. University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2019 Dec;84(4):1129-1151. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09674-5. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-019-09674-5
PMID:31264029
Abstract

The average test overlap rate is often computed and reported as a measure of test security risk or item pool utilization of a computerized adaptive test (CAT). Despite the prevalent use of this sample statistic in both literature and operations, its sampling distribution has never been known nor studied in earnest. In response, a proof is presented for the asymptotic distribution of a linear transformation of the average test overlap rate in fixed-length CAT. The theoretical results enable the estimation of standard error and construction of confidence intervals. Moreover, a practical simulation study demonstrates the statistical comparison of average test overlap rates between two CAT designs with different exposure control methods.

摘要

平均测试重叠率通常被计算和报告,作为计算机自适应测试(CAT)的测试安全性风险或项目池利用率的度量。尽管这个样本统计量在文献和操作中都被广泛使用,但它的抽样分布从未被真正了解或研究过。有鉴于此,本文提出了一种在固定长度 CAT 中平均测试重叠率的线性变换的渐近分布的证明。理论结果可以用于估计标准误差和构建置信区间。此外,实际的模拟研究表明了两种具有不同暴露控制方法的 CAT 设计之间的平均测试重叠率的统计比较。

相似文献

1
The Asymptotic Distribution of Average Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.计算机化自适应测验中平均测验重叠率的渐近分布。
Psychometrika. 2019 Dec;84(4):1129-1151. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09674-5. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
2
Conducting simulation studies for computerized adaptive testing using SimulCAT: an instructional piece.使用SimulCAT进行计算机自适应测试的模拟研究:一篇指导性文章。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018;15:20. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.20. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
3
Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model.使用部分计分模型在计算机自适应测试中控制项目曝光的策略。
J Appl Meas. 2008;9(1):1-17.
4
Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.将认知诊断计算机化自适应测验选题规则适配到传统项目反应理论中。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0227196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227196. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.比较单池和多池设计在计算机化测试中的测试安全性。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Sep;44(3):742-52. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0178-5.
6
On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.关于认知诊断计算机化自适应测试中的初始项目选择
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2016 Nov;69(3):291-315. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12072.
7
Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing.计算机自适应测试中项目选择算法的组成部分。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018 Mar 24;15:7. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.7. eCollection 2018.
8
[Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English].
Psicothema. 2006 Nov;18(4):828-34.
9
A Rate Function Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis.一种用于认知诊断的计算机自适应测试的速率函数方法。
Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):468-90. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9395-4. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.利用高阶确定性输入、噪声“与”门模型下认知诊断计算机自适应测验中的反应时间。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2020 Feb;73(1):109-141. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12160. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests.用于短长度测试和计算机自适应测试的带边界的最大似然分数估计方法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;40(4):289-301. doi: 10.1177/0146621616631317. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
2
Psychometrics behind Computerized Adaptive Testing.计算机自适应测试背后的心理测量学
Psychometrika. 2015 Mar;80(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s11336-014-9401-5. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
3
Does standard deviation matter? Using "standard deviation" to quantify security of multistage testing.
标准差重要吗?使用“标准差”量化多阶段测试的安全性。
Psychometrika. 2014 Jan;79(1):154-74. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9356-y. Epub 2013 Dec 10.