• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊术联合子宫切除术治疗子宫阴道脱垂

Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension combined with hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

作者信息

Li Chunbo, Dai Zhiyuan, Shu Huimin

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Sep;45(9):1918-1924. doi: 10.1111/jog.14035. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1111/jog.14035
PMID:31264339
Abstract

AIM

To demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a modified technique of laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension (LILS) with hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

METHODS

A total of 57 patients were treated by LILS combined with hysterectomy between Jan 2014 and Feb 2016. The perioperative parameters, such as operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay and intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse questionnaire classification was applied to evaluate the Pelvic Organ Prolapse stage, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale was used to determine the patients' satisfaction. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire were used to evaluate the functional improvement. All data were collected preoperatively and then at 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean surgical time was 130.4 (82-190) min, the average blood loss was 50.4 (10-300) mL and the mean hospitalization was 5.3 (4-8) days. The rates of intra- and postoperative complications were low. After a minimal of 12 months follow-up, the anatomical success rate was 85.5%, and the subjective satisfaction rate was 92.7%. The functional measures also presented a significant improvement with no recurrence of prolapse.

CONCLUSION

LILS combined with hysterectomy was a safe and effective technique and might be considered as an alternative treatment for patients with uterovaginal prolapse.

摘要

目的

探讨改良腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊术(LILS)联合子宫切除术治疗子宫阴道脱垂的疗效及安全性。

方法

2014年1月至2016年2月,共57例患者接受LILS联合子宫切除术治疗。记录手术时间、估计失血量、住院时间及术中、术后并发症等围手术期参数。采用盆腔器官脱垂问卷分类法评估盆腔器官脱垂分期,采用患者总体改善印象量表评估患者满意度。采用盆底困扰量表-20和盆底影响问卷评估功能改善情况。所有数据于术前及术后12个月收集。

结果

平均手术时间为130.4(82 - 190)分钟,平均失血量为50.4(10 - 300)毫升,平均住院时间为5.3(4 - 8)天。术中及术后并发症发生率较低。经过至少12个月的随访,解剖学成功率为85.5%,主观满意度为92.7%。功能指标也有显著改善,且脱垂无复发。

结论

LILS联合子宫切除术是一种安全有效的技术,可作为子宫阴道脱垂患者的替代治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension combined with hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊术联合子宫切除术治疗子宫阴道脱垂
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Sep;45(9):1918-1924. doi: 10.1111/jog.14035. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
2
Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜下保留子宫的腹股沟韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
A new laparoscopic technique of inguinal ligament suspension for vaginal vault prolapse.一种新的腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊带技术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.071. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study.腹腔镜盆底修复术是否需要子宫切除术?一项前瞻性研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):729-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.010.
5
Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊术与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2494-x.
6
Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.阴道网片子宫固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨悬吊带治疗女性阴道前壁脱垂的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1054-1065. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12812.
7
Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.经阴道改良骶棘韧带固定网片治疗盆腔器官脱垂的前后研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
[Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].[三种手术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的比较结果及生殖器脱垂复发危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Feb;46(2):94-100.
9
Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.经阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术的治疗效果:超过500例患者的单中心研究
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 May/Jun;24(3):203-206. doi: 10.1097/01.spv.0000533751.41539.5b.
10
Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse.腹腔镜下无网片高位子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术在子宫脱垂全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的应用。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Sep-Oct;25(6):952-953. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective analysis.经阴道子宫切除术阴道穹隆闭锁的频率:回顾性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2931-2935. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07476-4. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
A commentary on 'Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study'.关于“保留子宫的腹腔镜腹股沟韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项回顾性队列研究”的述评
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3124-3125. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001225.