Suppr超能文献

基于小组的个性化综合核心稳定性和平衡干预可即时并长期改善多发性硬化症患者的步行能力:一项随机对照试验。

Group-based, individualized, comprehensive core stability and balance intervention provides immediate and long-term improvements in walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Arntzen Ellen Christin, Straume Bjørn, Odeh Francis, Feys Peter, Normann Britt

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Physiother Res Int. 2020 Jan;25(1):e1798. doi: 10.1002/pri.1798. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Walking impairments are common in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Trunk control is a prerequisite for walking; however, knowledge regarding whether core stability and balance training influence walking is limited. This study aimed to investigate the immediate and long-term effects of a group-based, individualized, comprehensive core stability and balance intervention (GroupCoreDIST) compared with those of standard care on walking.

METHODS

This assessor-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial included 80 participants (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores 1-6.5) randomly allocated to GroupCoreDIST, conducted in groups of three for 60 min three times per week for 6 weeks (18 sessions) or standard care (n = 40/40). One participant attended no posttests, leaving 79 subjects for intention-to-treat analysis. The assessments were performed at baseline and at Weeks 7, 18, and 30. Outcomes included the 2-min walk test (2MWT), 10-m walk test-preferred/fast/slow speed (10MWT), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), Patient Global Impression of Change-walking (PGIC-walking), Rivermead Visual Gait Assessment (RVGA), and ActiGraphsWgt3X-BT activity monitors (ActiGraph). The statistical analyses included repeated-measures mixed models performed in IBM SPSS Version 24.

RESULTS

There were no significant between-group differences in the outcome measurements at baseline. The mean differences between groups were significant at all follow-up time points in favour of GroupCoreDIST for the 2MWT, 16.7 m at 7 weeks (95% CI [8.15, 25.25], 15.08 m at 18 weeks (95% CI [6.39, 23.77]) and 16.38 m at 30 weeks (95% CI [7.65, 25.12]; and the PGIC-walking, 0.89 points at 7 weeks (95% CI [1.34, 0.45]), 0.97 points at 18 weeks (95% CI [1.42, 0.52]), and 0.93 points at 30 weeks (95% CI [1.39, 0.48]; all p ≤ .001). The 10MWT-fast speed and the MSWS-12 showed significant between-group differences at 7 and 18 weeks and the RVGA at 7 weeks. No between-group differences were found regarding activity level (ActiGraph) or the 10MWT-preferred or slow speed.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard care, GroupCoreDIST significantly improved walking immediately after the intervention for up to 24 weeks of follow-up.

摘要

目的

行走障碍在多发性硬化症患者中很常见。躯干控制是行走的先决条件;然而,关于核心稳定性和平衡训练是否会影响行走的知识有限。本研究旨在调查与标准护理相比,基于小组的个体化综合核心稳定性和平衡干预(GroupCoreDIST)对行走的即时和长期影响。

方法

这项评估者盲法前瞻性随机对照试验纳入了80名参与者(扩展残疾状态量表评分1 - 6.5),随机分配至GroupCoreDIST组,每组3人,每周进行3次,每次60分钟,共6周(18节课程)或标准护理组(n = 40/40)。1名参与者未参加后期测试,因此有79名受试者进行意向性分析。评估在基线、第7周、第18周和第30周进行。结果包括2分钟步行试验(2MWT)、10米步行试验 - 偏好/快速/慢速(10MWT)、多发性硬化症步行量表 - 12(MSWS - 12)、患者对行走变化的整体印象(PGIC - 行走)、里弗米德视觉步态评估(RVGA)以及ActiGraphsWgt3X - BT活动监测器(ActiGraph)。统计分析采用IBM SPSS 24版中的重复测量混合模型。

结果

基线时各结局测量指标在组间无显著差异。在所有随访时间点,组间平均差异均有统计学意义,表明GroupCoreDIST组在2MWT方面更具优势,第7周时为16.7米(9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验