Fox Esther E, Hough Alan D, Creanor Siobhan, Gear Margaret, Freeman Jennifer A
E.E. Fox, PhD, Faculty of Health and Human Science, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
A.D. Hough, PhD, Faculty of Health and Human Science, Plymouth University.
Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1170-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150166. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Pilates exercise is often undertaken by people with multiple sclerosis (MS) who have balance and mobility difficulties.
The primary aim of the study was to compare the effects of 12 weeks of Pilates exercises with relaxation on balance and mobility. Secondary aims were: (1) to compare standardized exercises with relaxation and (2) to compare Pilates exercises with standardized exercises.
A multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants with Expanded Disability Status Scale scores of 4.0 to 6.5 were randomly allocated to groups receiving 12 weeks of Pilates exercises, standardized exercises, or relaxation. Assessments were undertaken at baseline and weeks 12 and 16 (primary outcome measure: 10-Meter Timed Walk Test [10MTW]).
One hundred participants (mean age=54 years, 74% female) were randomized to study groups. Six participants relapsed (withdrew from the study), leaving 94 participants for intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference in mean 10MTW measurements between the Pilates and relaxation groups. At 12 weeks, there was a mean reduction of 4.2 seconds for the standardized exercise group compared with the relaxation group (95% confidence interval [relaxation group minus standardized exercise group measurements]=0.0, 8.4) and a mean reduction of 3.7 seconds for the Pilates group compared with the standardized exercise group (95% confidence interval [Pilates group minus standardized exercise group measurements]=-0.4 to 7.8). At 16 weeks, mean 10MTW times for the standardized exercise group remained quicker than those for the Pilates and relaxation groups, although the differences were nonsignificant. There were no significant differences between the Pilates and relaxation groups for any secondary outcome measure.
In this study, therapists were limited to a standardized basket of exercises that may have affected the study outcomes. Furthermore, choosing measures such as posturography to assess balance, accelerometry to assess walking, or a specific trunk assessment scale might have been more responsive in detecting changes in outcome.
Participants did not improve significantly, either in the short term or at the 4-week follow-up, on the 10MTW after 12 weeks of Pilates exercises compared with 12 weeks of relaxation.
患有多发性硬化症(MS)且存在平衡和行动困难的人群经常进行普拉提运动。
本研究的主要目的是比较12周普拉提运动与放松训练对平衡和行动能力的影响。次要目的为:(1)比较标准化运动与放松训练;(2)比较普拉提运动与标准化运动。
开展了一项多中心、评估者盲法、随机对照试验。将扩展残疾状态量表评分在4.0至6.5之间的参与者随机分配至接受12周普拉提运动、标准化运动或放松训练的组中。在基线以及第12周和第16周进行评估(主要结局指标:10米定时步行测试[10MTW])。
100名参与者(平均年龄=54岁,74%为女性)被随机分配至各研究组。6名参与者复发(退出研究),剩余94名参与者进行意向性分析。普拉提组和放松训练组的10MTW平均测量值无显著差异。在第12周时,与放松训练组相比,标准化运动组平均减少了4.2秒(95%置信区间[放松训练组测量值减去标准化运动组测量值]=0.0,8.4);与标准化运动组相比,普拉提组平均减少了3.7秒(95%置信区间[普拉提组测量值减去标准化运动组测量值]=-0.4至7.8)。在第16周时,标准化运动组的10MTW平均时间仍比普拉提组和放松训练组快,尽管差异不显著。在任何次要结局指标方面,普拉提组和放松训练组之间均无显著差异。
在本研究中,治疗师仅限于一套标准化的运动项目,这可能影响了研究结果。此外,选择诸如姿势描记法来评估平衡、加速度计来评估步行或特定的躯干评估量表,在检测结局变化方面可能更具敏感性。
与12周的放松训练相比,参与者在进行12周普拉提运动后,无论是在短期内还是在4周随访时,10MTW均未显著改善。