• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶车辆中的儿童运输:探索性研究。

Transporting Children in Autonomous Vehicles: An Exploratory Study.

机构信息

367268 Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.

6567 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):278-287. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853993. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1177/0018720819853993
PMID:31268359
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify factors that impact parents' decisions about allowing an unaccompanied child to ride in an autonomous vehicle (AV).

BACKGROUND

AVs are being tested in several U.S. cities and on highways in multiple states. Meanwhile, suburban parents are using ridesharing services to shuttle children from school to extracurricular activities. Parents may soon be able to hire AVs to transport children.

METHOD

Nineteen parents of 8- to 16-year-old children, and some of their children, rode in a driving simulator in autonomous mode, then were interviewed. Parents also participated in focus groups. Topics included minimum age for solo child passengers, types of trips unaccompanied children might take, and vehicle features needed to support child passengers.

RESULTS

Parents would require two-way audio communication and prefer video feeds of vehicle interiors, seatbelt checks, automatic locking, secure passenger identification, and remote access to vehicle information. Parents cited convenience as the greatest benefit and fear that AVs could not protect passengers during unplanned trip interruptions as their greatest concern.

CONCLUSION

Manufacturers have an opportunity to design family-friendly AVs from the outset, rather than retrofit them to be safe for child passengers. More research, especially usability studies where families interact with technology prototypes, is needed to understand how AV design impacts child passengers.

APPLICATION

Potential applications of this research include not only designing vehicles that can be used to safely transport children, seniors who no longer drive, and individuals with disabilities but also developing regulations, policies, and societal infrastructure to support safe child transport via AVs.

摘要

目的

确定影响父母允许儿童独自乘坐自动驾驶汽车(AV)的因素。

背景

在美国的几个城市和多个州的高速公路上,都在测试自动驾驶汽车。与此同时,郊区的父母正在使用拼车服务接送孩子上下学和参加课外活动。父母可能很快就能聘请自动驾驶汽车来接送孩子。

方法

19 名 8 至 16 岁儿童的父母及其部分孩子在自动驾驶模式下乘坐驾驶模拟器,然后接受采访。父母还参加了焦点小组。讨论的主题包括儿童独自乘客的最低年龄、儿童可能乘坐的旅行类型以及支持儿童乘客的车辆功能。

结果

父母需要双向音频通讯,并希望车内视频反馈、安全带检查、自动锁定、乘客身份识别安全、以及远程访问车辆信息。父母认为自动驾驶汽车的最大好处是方便,但也担心自动驾驶汽车在计划外的行程中断时无法保护乘客,这是他们最担心的问题。

结论

制造商有机会从一开始就设计适合家庭使用的自动驾驶汽车,而不是对其进行改装以确保儿童乘客的安全。需要进行更多的研究,特别是家庭与技术原型互动的可用性研究,以了解自动驾驶汽车的设计如何影响儿童乘客。

应用

这项研究的潜在应用不仅包括设计可以安全运送儿童、不再开车的老年人和残疾人士的车辆,还包括制定法规、政策和社会基础设施,以支持通过自动驾驶汽车安全运送儿童。

相似文献

1
Transporting Children in Autonomous Vehicles: An Exploratory Study.自动驾驶车辆中的儿童运输:探索性研究。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):278-287. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853993. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
2
Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.激进驾驶还是保守驾驶?研究自动驾驶车辆交互类型和道路事件对驾驶员信任和偏好驾驶风格的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2166-2178. doi: 10.1177/00187208231181199. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
3
Factors that influence parents' intentions of using autonomous vehicles to transport children to and from school.影响家长使用自动驾驶汽车接送孩子上下学意愿的因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105991. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105991. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
Are parents ready to use autonomous vehicles to transport children? Concerns and safety features.家长是否准备好使用自动驾驶汽车来接送孩子?关注和安全特性。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:287-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.决定何时在自动驾驶车前穿行:儿童和成人行人对 eHMI 计时和车辆运动学的反应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jul;202:107567. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107567. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
6
sCARy! Risk Perceptions in Autonomous Driving: The Influence of Experience on Perceived Benefits and Barriers.令人担忧!自动驾驶中的风险认知:经验对感知收益和障碍的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):342-357. doi: 10.1111/risa.13190. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
7
Choice of teenagers' vehicles and views on vehicle safety: survey of parents of novice teenage drivers.青少年对车辆的选择及对车辆安全的看法:对新手青少年驾驶员家长的调查
J Safety Res. 2007;38(6):707-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
8
Autonomous Vehicles and Public Health.自动驾驶汽车与公共健康
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:329-345. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Perceptions of safety on a shared road: Driving, cycling, or walking near an autonomous vehicle.在共享道路上的安全感知:驾驶、骑行或步行靠近自动驾驶车辆。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:249-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.日益自动化的车辆对人类驾驶员的挑战。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):310-328. doi: 10.1177/0018720819900402. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Acoustic Noise Level and Impulsiveness Inside Vehicles in Different Traffic Conditions.不同交通条件下车内声级和脉冲噪声的评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;22(5):1946. doi: 10.3390/s22051946.
2
Characterization of Noise Level Inside a Vehicle under Different Conditions.车辆在不同条件下的噪声水平特征描述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 27;20(9):2471. doi: 10.3390/s20092471.