• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症联合委员会第八版胰腺癌分期手册变化的影响。

Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

From the Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

Surgery, and.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2019 Aug;48(7):876-882. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001349.

DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000001349
PMID:31268985
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Consistent and reliable tumor staging is a critical factor in determining treatment strategy, selection of patients for adjuvant therapy, and for therapeutic clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number and extent of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases that would have a different pT, pN, and overall stages based on the new eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system when compared with the seventh edition.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with PDAC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, total pancreatectomy, or distal pancreatectomy from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 340 cases were included.

RESULTS

According to the seventh edition, the vast majority of tumors in our cohort were staged as pT3 tumors (88.2%). Restaging these cases with the new size-based pT system resulted in a more equal distribution among the 3 pT categories, with higher percentage of pT2 cases (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly adopted pT stage protocol for PDAC is clinically relevant, ensures a more equal distribution among different stages, and allows for a significant prognostic stratification. In contrast, the new pN classification (pN1 and pN2) based on the number of positive lymph nodes failed to show survival differences and remains controversial.

摘要

目的

肿瘤分期的一致性和可靠性是确定治疗策略、辅助治疗患者选择以及治疗性临床试验的关键因素。本研究旨在评估根据新的第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统,与第七版相比,有多少例胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)病例的 pT、pN 和总体分期会有所不同。

方法

回顾性分析了 2007 年至 2017 年间接受胰十二指肠切除术、全胰切除术或胰体尾切除术的 PDAC 患者。共纳入 340 例患者。

结果

根据第七版,我们队列中的大多数肿瘤分期为 pT3 期(88.2%)。用新的基于大小的 pT 系统重新分期这些病例后,3 个 pT 分期之间的分布更加均匀,pT2 期的比例更高(55%)。

结论

新采用的 PDAC pT 分期方案具有临床意义,可确保不同分期之间的分布更加均匀,并进行显著的预后分层。相比之下,新的基于阳性淋巴结数量的 pN 分类(pN1 和 pN2)未能显示出生存差异,仍存在争议。

相似文献

1
Impact of Changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第八版胰腺癌分期手册变化的影响。
Pancreas. 2019 Aug;48(7):876-882. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001349.
2
International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)TNM 分期系统在可切除胰腺癌患者中的国际验证。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):e183617. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3617. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
3
pT but not pN stage of the 8th TNM classification significantly improves prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.第八版TNM分期中的pT分期而非pN分期能显著改善胰腺导管腺癌的预后评估。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
4
Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.验证美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版胰腺导管腺癌分期系统。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2159-2165. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens.用于远端胰腺切除术标本标准化病理评估的DIPLOMA方法。
J Vis Exp. 2020 Feb 1(156). doi: 10.3791/60343.
6
A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.建议修改第 8 版 UICC 胰腺癌分期系统。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):667-677. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02167-z. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.对切除胰腺癌中准确的淋巴结分期和术前检测的全面评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3607-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
8
Pancreatic volume is one of the independent prognostic factors for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.胰腺体积是可切除性胰腺导管腺癌的独立预后因素之一。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Aug;23(8):472-9. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.365. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
9
Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8 edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.肠系膜门静脉侵犯应成为胰腺导管腺癌 TNM 分期的一个重要因素:美国癌症联合委员会第 8 版分期系统的修改建议。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 14;25(46):6752-6766. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6752.
10
Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?评估新版 AJCC 8 分期系统对胰腺腺癌患者的预后价值;是否需要对 III 期进行亚分类?
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.027. Epub 2018 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer.全国范围内验证第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会 TNM 分期系统和 5 项针对可切除胰腺癌的修改建议。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;29(9):5988-5999. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11664-4. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Clinicopathological correlation of radiologic measurement of post-therapy tumor size and tumor volume for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.胰腺导管腺癌治疗后肿瘤大小和体积的影像学测量与临床病理相关性分析。
Pancreatology. 2021 Jan;21(1):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 14.