• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Engaging Stakeholders, from Inception and Throughout the Study, is Good Research Practice to Promote use of Findings.让利益相关者从研究开始到研究结束都参与进来,是促进研究结果应用的良好研究实践。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Sep;23(Suppl 2):214-219. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02574-w.
2
Learning by doing in practice: a roundtable discussion about stakeholder engagement in implementation research.从实践中学习:利益相关者参与实施研究的圆桌讨论。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0275-8.
3
Lessons learned from Evidence-Informed Decision-Making in Nutrition & Health (EVIDENT) in Africa: a project evaluation.从非洲营养与健康循证决策(EVIDENT)中学到的经验教训:项目评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 31;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0413-6.
4
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.
5
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
6
Opportunities for linking research to policy: lessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER network.将研究与政策联系起来的机会:从 ANSER 网络中的性健康和生殖健康实施研究中吸取的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 17;16(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0397-7.
7
The challenge of bridging the gap between researchers and policy makers: experiences of a Health Policy Research Group in engaging policy makers to support evidence informed policy making in Nigeria.弥合研究人员与政策制定者之间差距的挑战:一个卫生政策研究小组在促使政策制定者支持尼日利亚循证政策制定方面的经验。
Global Health. 2016 Nov 4;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0209-1.
8
Evaluating stakeholder involvement in building a decision support tool for NHS health checks: co-producing the WorkHORSE study.评估利益相关者在为国民保健制度健康检查构建决策支持工具方面的参与情况:共同开展 WorkHORSE 研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01205-y.
9
Gaps and strategies in developing health research capacity: experience from the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance.发展卫生研究能力方面的差距和策略:来自尼日利亚实施科学联盟的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 12;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0289-x.
10
Promoting Researchers and Policy-Makers Collaboration in Evidence-Informed Policy-Making in Nigeria: Outcome of a Two-Way Secondment Model between University and Health Ministry.促进尼日利亚研究人员和政策制定者在循证决策方面的合作:大学与卫生部之间双向借调模式的结果。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):522-531. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.123.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory factor analysis of constructs used for investigating research uptake for public healthcare practice and policy in a resource-limited setting, South Africa.在资源有限的南非环境下,对用于调查公共卫生实践和政策研究接受度的研究构建进行探索性因子分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):1423. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10165-8.
2
Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.低中等收入国家健康政策制定与实践研究转化面临的挑战:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 6;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01084-5.
3
Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training.全球卫生领导力培训的差距、挑战和机遇。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):62. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3219. eCollection 2021.
4
Documenting HIV research-utilization activities, outputs and outcomes: examples and lessons learned from Project SOAR.记录艾滋病病毒研究利用活动、产出及成果:来自“翱翔计划”项目的实例与经验教训
Arch Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;79(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00628-x.
5
When the Best Pandemic Models are the Simplest.当最佳的大流行模型是最简单的模型时。
Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;9(11):353. doi: 10.3390/biology9110353.
6
Leadership training to accelerate progress in public health in sub-Saharan Africa: time for action.开展领导力培训以加速撒哈拉以南非洲地区的公共卫生进展:行动时刻已至。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1253-e1254. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30321-1.
7
Implementation Science: Helping to Accelerate Progress Toward Achieving the 90-90-90 Goal.实施科学:助力加速实现90-90-90目标的进程。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Sep;23(Suppl 2):115-119. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02649-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Capacity Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recognizing the Importance of Local Partnerships in Designing and Disseminating HIV Implementation Science to Reach the 90-90-90 Goals.撒哈拉以南非洲的研究能力加强:认识到在设计和传播艾滋病毒实施科学以实现 90-90-90 目标方面,本地伙伴关系的重要性。
AIDS Behav. 2019 Sep;23(Suppl 2):206-213. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02538-0.
2
A research utilisation framework for informing global health and development policies and programmes.用于为全球卫生和发展政策及方案提供信息的研究利用框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 9;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0284-2.
3
Continuous quality improvement intervention for adolescent and young adult HIV testing services in Kenya improves HIV knowledge.肯尼亚针对青少年和青年成人艾滋病毒检测服务的持续质量改进干预措施提高了艾滋病毒知识水平。
AIDS. 2017 Jul 1;31 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S243-S252. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001531.
4
Improving knowledge translation in Uganda: more needs to be done.在乌干达改善知识转化:仍有更多工作要做。
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):14. doi: 10.11694/pamj.supp.2014.17.1.3482. eCollection 2014.
5
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.政策制定者使用证据的障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 3;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
6
Creating a Knowledge Translation Platform: nine lessons from the Zambia Forum for Health Research.创建知识转化平台:来自赞比亚卫生研究论坛的九条经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Oct 3;10:31. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-31.
7
Managing research evidence to inform action: influencing HIV policy to protect marginalised populations in Pakistan.管理研究证据以提供信息:影响艾滋病毒政策,保护巴基斯坦的边缘化人群。
Glob Public Health. 2012;7(5):482-94. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2012.663778. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
8
What shapes research impact on policy? Understanding research uptake in sexual and reproductive health policy processes in resource poor contexts.哪些因素塑造了研究对政策的影响?理解资源匮乏环境下性与生殖健康政策过程中的研究采纳。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 16;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-S1-S3.
9
Research translation to inform national health policies: learning from multiple perspectives in Uganda.研究转化以支持国家卫生政策:乌干达的多方经验
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Mar 9;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-S1-S13.
10
Operational research in low-income countries: what, why, and how?低收入国家的运筹学:是什么、为什么以及如何开展?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Nov;9(11):711-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70229-4.

让利益相关者从研究开始到研究结束都参与进来,是促进研究结果应用的良好研究实践。

Engaging Stakeholders, from Inception and Throughout the Study, is Good Research Practice to Promote use of Findings.

机构信息

Palladium, Project SOAR, 4301 Connecticut Ave, Suite 280, Washington, DC, 20008, USA.

Data, Informatics and Analytical Solutions, Palladium, 308 West Rosemary Street, Suite 203, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2019 Sep;23(Suppl 2):214-219. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02574-w.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-019-02574-w
PMID:31270641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6773669/
Abstract

The need for research-informed programming and policy making is well established. However, there is limited evidence that, when researchers actively promote utilization of research findings, stakeholders use such findings for decision making in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). A common barrier for research uptake in LMIC is that researchers focus on passive dissemination of final findings as the primary vehicle to affect research uptake. A more active approach to facilitating research utilization (RU) is necessary. Project SOAR, a six-year USAID-funded operations research project, recognized this gap and developed an approach to include the end data users in the research process from inception to final results dissemination. In this commentary, we make recommendations for active facilitation of research uptake using emerging lessons from SOAR's RU process that focuses on ongoing engagement of stakeholders throughout the life of the study.

摘要

需要以研究为依据制定规划和政策,这一点已得到充分证明。然而,有证据表明,当研究人员积极推动利用研究成果时,利益攸关方会在中低收入国家(LMIC)利用这些研究成果做出决策的情况却十分有限。在中低收入国家,研究成果采用的一个常见障碍是,研究人员将重点放在被动传播最终研究结果上,将其作为影响研究成果采用的主要手段。因此,需要采取更为积极的方法来促进研究成果的利用。美国国际开发署(USAID)资助的为期六年的“增强研究和评估成果运用”(SOAR)项目认识到了这一差距,并开发了一种方法,从研究开始到最终结果传播,将最终数据使用者纳入研究过程。在本评论中,我们针对利用 SOAR 在促进研究成果采用方面的新经验教训,提出了一些建议,这些经验教训侧重于在研究过程的整个生命周期中与利益攸关方进行持续互动。