Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Division of Community Dentistry, Department of Family and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Feb;24(2):945-951. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02992-z. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) does not always provide adequate pulpal anesthesia, and supplemental techniques have been investigated in adults. This study aimed to pre- and intraoperatively evaluate the success of pulpal anesthesia following supplemental mandibular buccal infiltration (SMBI) after failure of IANB in permanent mandibular molars with deep caries of pediatric patients.
Following IANB, preoperative pulpal anesthesia was assessed using the cold test, and success was defined when there was a negative response. In cases with failed IANB, SMBI was administered, and pulpal anesthesia was re-evaluated. A maximum of three SMBIs was allowed. After achieving successful preoperative pulpal anesthesia, treatment was then initiated. Intraoperatively, success of pulpal anesthesia was determined when the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale reported by the patients was ≤ four.
Sixty molars of patients aged 9.6 ± 2.3 years were included in the study. The success of preoperative pulpal anesthesia following IANB was 33.3%. The overall cumulative preoperative pulpal anesthesia after three SMBIs was 95%. However, the success of intraoperative pulpal anesthesia was only 66.7%.
SMBI greatly improved the success of preoperative pulpal anesthesia after failure of IANB. However, the success of preoperative pulpal anesthesia, confirmed by the cold test, does not always guarantee intraoperative pulpal anesthesia, especially in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
IANB produced low pulpal anesthesia in vital permanent mandibular molars with deep caries of pediatric patients. Clinicians should always prepare for supplemental injection both pre- and intra-operatively.
下齿槽神经阻滞(IANB)并不总能提供充分的牙髓麻醉,因此已对成人进行了补充技术的研究。本研究旨在评估在儿童深龋的恒磨牙中 IANB 失败后,补充下颌颊侧浸润(SMBI)对牙髓麻醉的术前和术中效果。
IANB 后,使用冷测试评估术前牙髓麻醉,并在出现阴性反应时定义为成功。对于 IANB 失败的病例,给予 SMBI,并重新评估牙髓麻醉。最多允许进行三次 SMBI。在获得成功的术前牙髓麻醉后,开始治疗。术中,当患者报告的 Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评分量表≤4 时,确定牙髓麻醉成功。
本研究纳入了 60 颗年龄为 9.6±2.3 岁的磨牙。IANB 后术前牙髓麻醉的成功率为 33.3%。三次 SMBI 后总的术前牙髓麻醉累积成功率为 95%。然而,术中牙髓麻醉的成功率仅为 66.7%。
SMBI 极大地提高了 IANB 失败后术前牙髓麻醉的成功率。然而,冷测试确认的术前牙髓麻醉成功率并不总能保证术中牙髓麻醉,尤其是在不可逆性牙髓炎的牙齿中。
IANB 在儿童深龋的活髓恒磨牙中产生的牙髓麻醉效果较低。临床医生应始终在术前和术中做好补充注射的准备。