Suppr超能文献

T 扫描和 3D 口内扫描测量咬合接触面积的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and Validity of T-scan and 3D Intraoral Scanning for Measuring the Occlusal Contact Area.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, IDIBELL, Spain.

Oral Health and Masticatory System Group, (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2020 Jan;29(1):19-25. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13096. Epub 2019 Jul 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability of T-scan and 3D intraoral scan techniques for assessing the occlusal contact area (OCA), compared to occlusal registration and also to assess the validity of the techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one dentate adults participated in this cross-sectional study. T-scan records were used to measure the OCA at maximum bite force and at 50% of maximum force using the software's bite force selection tool. A second method measured the OCA between 2 virtual models scanned intraorally using a 3D surface scan and considering the occlusal contact at 2 interocclusal distances (0-100 and 0-200 µm). The third method measured OCA using occlusal registration at moderate and maximum occlusal force, and considering contact at the 2 interocclusal distances (0-100 and 0-200 µm). Images obtained using the 3 methods were analyzed using ImageJ software. Test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and validity by Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

ICCs ranged from 0.56 to 0.79 (p < 0.001) for the T-scan; 0.37 to 0.61 (p < 0.05) for 3D surface scan; and 0.92 to 0.95 (p < 0.0005) for occlusal registration. The highest OCA values were obtained using the T-scan, and the lowest using the 3D surface scan. Occlusal registration measurements had the highest correlations with those of the other techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

T-scan is a reliable method for measuring the OCA, but the 3D surface scan is not. Occlusal registration showed a high validity.

摘要

目的

通过与牙合记录相比,确定 T 扫描和 3D 口内扫描技术评估咬合接触面积(OCA)的可靠性,并评估这些技术的有效性。

材料和方法

本横断面研究纳入了 31 名有牙成年人。T 扫描记录用于使用软件的咬合力选择工具在最大咬合力和最大咬合力的 50%时测量 OCA。第二种方法在使用 3D 表面扫描对内扫描的两个虚拟模型之间测量 OCA,并考虑在两个牙合距离(0-100 和 0-200 µm)处的牙合接触。第三种方法使用中等和最大牙合力时的牙合记录测量 OCA,并考虑在两个牙合距离(0-100 和 0-200 µm)处的接触。使用 ImageJ 软件分析通过这 3 种方法获得的图像。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测试-重测可靠性,使用 Pearson 相关性评估有效性。

结果

T 扫描的 ICC 范围为 0.56 至 0.79(p < 0.001);3D 表面扫描的 ICC 范围为 0.37 至 0.61(p < 0.05);牙合记录的 ICC 范围为 0.92 至 0.95(p < 0.0005)。使用 T 扫描获得的 OCA 值最高,使用 3D 表面扫描获得的 OCA 值最低。牙合记录的测量值与其他技术的测量值相关性最高。

结论

T 扫描是一种可靠的测量 OCA 的方法,但 3D 表面扫描不可靠。牙合记录具有较高的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验