• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟侵蚀条件对不同正畸托槽-弓丝组合摩擦行为的影响。

The effect of simulated erosive conditions on the frictional behavior of different orthodontic bracket-wire combinations.

作者信息

Stefański Tomasz, Kloc-Ptaszna Anna, Postek-Stefańska Lidia

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

Institute of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.

出版信息

Dent Med Probl. 2019 Apr-Jun;56(2):173-177. doi: 10.17219/dmp/105832.

DOI:10.17219/dmp/105832
PMID:31274255
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frictional resistance is an important parameter in orthodontics that influences the effectiveness of archwire-guided tooth movement. Since the consumption of dietary acids has increased considerably over the last 2 decades, there is a rationale for investigating the process of degradation of orthodontic materials in an acidic environment and its effect on clinical efficiency.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of simulated erosive conditions on the frictional behavior between the brackets of 3 different materials and 3 different wire alloys.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three types of twin orthodontic brackets (stainless steel (SS), monocrystalline ceramic and titanium) and 3 types of archwires of the same dimension (SS, nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) and beta-titanium (titanium-molybdenum alloy - TMA) were tested in 9 different combinations under simulated erosive and non-erosive conditions (18 groups, n = 10). Bracket-wire specimens in the erosivecondition groups were subjected to a pH cycling regimen with 1% citric acid and artificial saliva for 5 consecutive days. Bracket-wire specimens from the non-erosive-condition groups were incubated only in artificial saliva for 5 days. Static and kinetic friction were determined by measuring the force needed to move the wire through the bracket. A three-way analysis of variance and pairwise comparisons with the Student-Newman-Keuls test were performed.

RESULTS

Irrespective of the conditions, SS brackets with SS wire demonstrated significantly lower mean static and kinetic frictional resistance than other bracket-wire combinations (p < 0.01). Ceramic and titanium brackets generated high frictional forces with all 3 types of wire tested. Erosive conditions did not significantly influence static and kinetic frictional resistance in all bracket-wire groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Erosive conditions do not affect the frictional behavior of SS, Ni-Ti and TMA orthodontic archwires at a clinically significant level.

摘要

背景

摩擦力是正畸学中的一个重要参数,会影响弓丝引导牙齿移动的效果。由于在过去20年中饮食酸的摄入量大幅增加,因此有理由研究正畸材料在酸性环境中的降解过程及其对临床效果的影响。

目的

本研究旨在评估模拟侵蚀条件对3种不同材料的托槽与3种不同丝材合金之间摩擦行为的影响。

材料与方法

在模拟侵蚀和非侵蚀条件下,对3种类型的双托槽正畸托槽(不锈钢(SS)、单晶陶瓷和钛)和3种相同尺寸的弓丝(SS、镍钛(Ni-Ti)和β钛(钛钼合金-TMA))进行9种不同组合的测试(18组,n = 10)。侵蚀条件组的托槽-弓丝标本连续5天接受pH循环方案,使用1%柠檬酸和人工唾液。非侵蚀条件组的托槽-弓丝标本仅在人工唾液中孵育5天。通过测量使弓丝穿过托槽所需的力来确定静摩擦力和动摩擦力。进行了三因素方差分析以及使用Student-Newman-Keuls检验的两两比较。

结果

无论条件如何,SS托槽与SS弓丝的平均静摩擦力和动摩擦力均显著低于其他托槽-弓丝组合(p < 0.01)。陶瓷和钛托槽与所有3种测试丝材产生的摩擦力都很高。侵蚀条件对所有托槽-弓丝组的静摩擦力和动摩擦力没有显著影响。

结论

侵蚀条件在临床上显著水平下不会影响SS、Ni-Ti和TMA正畸弓丝的摩擦行为。

相似文献

1
The effect of simulated erosive conditions on the frictional behavior of different orthodontic bracket-wire combinations.模拟侵蚀条件对不同正畸托槽-弓丝组合摩擦行为的影响。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Apr-Jun;56(2):173-177. doi: 10.17219/dmp/105832.
2
Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.评估传统及金属植入陶瓷托槽在各种托槽-弓丝组合中的摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00501-8.
3
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦阻力:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015.
4
Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.不同托槽-弓丝组合的摩擦力
Aust Orthod J. 2004 May;20(1):25-30.
5
Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.不锈钢和美观自锁托槽在各种托槽-弓丝组合中的摩擦力评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):395-402. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00504-3.
6
An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.不同尺寸弓丝与传统不锈钢及自锁不锈钢托槽在多种托槽-弓丝组合方式下摩擦特性的体外评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):660-664. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102.
7
Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.烧结不锈钢托槽与正畸弓丝之间的相对动摩擦力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70153-2.
8
Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent.金属托槽和正畸弓丝浸泡于含氟预防剂后摩擦阻力的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Nov;130(5):568.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.028.
9
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.弓丝与陶瓷托槽之间摩擦力的体外评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.005.
10
Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.不同弓丝合金在主动和被动自锁托槽中摩擦力的比较评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):675-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of simulated gastric acid on the physical and mechanical properties of vacuum-formed retainers: an in vitro study.模拟胃酸对真空成型保持器物理和机械性能的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05548-8.
2
Single-component orthodontic adhesives: comparison of the clinical and in vitro performance.单组分正畸粘接剂:临床与体外性能比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3987-3999. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03729-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.