Fallon R J, Mandal B K, Mayon-White R T, Scott A C
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow, U.K.
J Infect. 1988 Mar;16(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(88)93872-8.
The response of 310 patients with typhoid or paratyphoid fevers to current antibiotic therapy was studied retrospectively. Most patients were of Asian or European origin, thus reflecting the areas in which they were infected. Of the 244 patients with well-recorded therapy 63% were treated with chloramphenicol, 22% with co-trimoxazole and the remainder with various penicillins. There was little difference in response in terms of resolution of fever. Symptoms persisted in only two of 153 (1.3%) patients given chloramphenicol but side-effects led to a change of treatment in nine of these patients. Co-trimoxazole was not significantly inferior and amoxycillin performed well, but the small number of cases treated with ampicillin or mecillinam did not respond as well as those treated with the other drugs.
对310例伤寒或副伤寒患者当前抗生素治疗反应进行了回顾性研究。大多数患者来自亚洲或欧洲,这反映了他们受感染的地区。在244例治疗记录良好的患者中,63%接受氯霉素治疗,22%接受复方新诺明治疗,其余患者接受各种青霉素治疗。在发热消退方面,反应差异不大。在153例接受氯霉素治疗的患者中,仅有2例(1.3%)症状持续存在,但其中9例患者因副作用导致治疗改变。复方新诺明并不明显逊色,阿莫西林表现良好,但接受氨苄西林或美西林治疗的病例数较少,其反应不如接受其他药物治疗的患者。