使用电子烟的感知相对危害可预测美国成年卷烟和电子烟双重使用者未来的产品转换。
Perceived relative harm of using e-cigarettes predicts future product switching among US adult cigarette and e-cigarette dual users.
机构信息
Office of Science, FDA Center for Tobacco Products, Calverton, MD, USA.
出版信息
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2197-2205. doi: 10.1111/add.14730. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
People's perceptions of the harmfulness of e-cigarettes, compared with cigarettes, may influence their product use decisions. We tested if perceiving e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes predicted whether cigarette and e-cigarette dual users switched their product use status 1 year later, becoming exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers, or non-users of both product types.
DESIGN
Longitudinal analyses of waves 2 (2014-15) and 3 (2015-16) of the prospective, national Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
SETTING
United States.
PARTICIPANTS
Adults who reported using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 2 reported their perceptions of e-cigarette harm at wave 2, and reported whether they used cigarettes and e-cigarettes within the past 30 days at wave 3 (n = 2211).
MEASUREMENTS
The key predictor was wave 2 perceptions of e-cigarette harm compared with cigarettes ('less harmful,' 'about the same', 'more harmful' or 'don't know'). The key outcome was wave 3 past 30-day use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes, classified into four categories: exclusive e-cigarette use (i.e. use of e-cigarettes but not cigarettes), exclusive cigarette smoking (i.e. use of cigarettes but not e-cigarettes), dual use of both product types and non-use of both product types.
FINDINGS
At wave 2, 59.4% of dual users perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes [95% confidence interval (CI) = 56.9, 61.9]. Compared with those with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm, dual users who perceived e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes were more likely to become exclusive e-cigarette users 1 year later [7.5 versus 2.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.7-4.8], more likely to remain dual users (39.6 versus 29.9%; aOR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2-1.8), less likely to become exclusive cigarette smokers (44.8 versus 59.4%; aOR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.7) and similarly likely to become non-users of both product types (8.2 versus 8.0%; aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7).
CONCLUSIONS
US adult dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes who perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes appear to be more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use, more likely to remain dual users and less likely to switch to exclusive cigarette use 1 year later than dual users with other perceptions of e-cigarette harm.
背景和目的
人们对电子烟危害的认知与香烟相比,可能会影响他们对产品的使用决策。我们测试了,如果认为电子烟比香烟危害小,是否会预测到 1 年后,烟弹和香烟双重使用者的产品使用状态会发生变化,成为电子烟的单一使用者、香烟的单一使用者或两种产品都不再使用。
设计
前瞻性、全国性人口烟草与健康评估(PATH)研究的第 2 波(2014-15 年)和第 3 波(2015-16 年)的纵向分析。
地点
美国。
参与者
在第 2 波报告过去 30 天内同时使用香烟和电子烟的成年人,在第 2 波报告他们对电子烟危害的看法,然后在第 3 波报告过去 30 天内使用香烟和电子烟的情况(n=2211)。
测量
关键预测因素是第 2 波对电子烟危害与香烟的认知比较(“危害小”、“差不多”、“危害大”或“不知道”)。关键结果是第 3 波过去 30 天内使用电子烟和香烟的情况,分为四类:电子烟的单一使用者(即使用电子烟而不使用香烟)、香烟的单一使用者(即使用香烟而不使用电子烟)、两种产品都使用的双重使用者和两种产品都不使用的非使用者。
发现
在第 2 波,59.4%的双重使用者认为电子烟的危害比香烟小[95%置信区间(CI)=56.9,61.9]。与对电子烟危害有其他看法的双重使用者相比,认为电子烟危害较小的双重使用者在 1 年后更有可能成为电子烟的单一使用者[7.5%比 2.7%;调整后的优势比(aOR)=2.9,95%CI=1.7-4.8],更有可能继续成为双重使用者(39.6%比 29.9%;aOR=1.5,95%CI=1.2-1.8),不太可能成为香烟的单一使用者(44.8%比 59.4%;aOR=0.6,95%CI=0.5-0.7),成为两种产品非使用者的可能性也相似(8.2%比 8.0%;aOR=1.1,95%CI=0.7-1.7)。
结论
美国电子烟和香烟双重使用者,如果认为电子烟比香烟危害小,似乎更有可能转为电子烟的单一使用者,更有可能继续成为双重使用者,而不太可能在 1 年后转为香烟的单一使用者,而不是对电子烟危害有其他看法的双重使用者。