• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种补充了神经症状的姑息治疗结果测量工具(HOPE+):确定神经疾病患者的姑息治疗关注点。

Validation of a palliative care outcome measurement tool supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+): Identification of palliative concerns of neurological patients.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Neurological Centre for Rehabilitation-MEDIAN-Clinics, Bad Salzuflen, Germany.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1221-1231. doi: 10.1177/0269216319861927. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1177/0269216319861927
PMID:31280657
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest to integrate palliative care and its structures into the care of neurological patients. However, in Germany there is no comprehensive assessment tool capturing the symptoms of patients with advanced neurological diseases.

AIM

To validate a newly developed palliative care measurement tool based on an extension of the validated core documentation system Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation considering additional neurological issues (HOPE+).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study using HOPE+ and as external criteria, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and the 12 months "surprise" question (12-SQ) in a neurological population, and assessment for its construct validity and diagnostic accuracy.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All newly admitted patients to the Department of Neurorehabilitation, Dr. Becker Rhein-Sieg-Clinic aged 18-100 years (#DRKS00010947).

RESULTS

Data from 263 patients (63 ± 14 years of age) were analyzed. HOPE+ revealed a moderately correlated six-factor structure ( = -0.543-0.525). Correlation analysis to evaluate discriminant validity using ECOG as external criterion was high (s(261) = 0.724,  < 0.001) and confirmed for severely affected patients by adding the 12-SQ ("No"-group: 48.00 ± 14.92 vs "Yes"-group: 18.67 ± 7.57,  < 0.009). Operating characteristics show satisfactory diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve: 0.746 ± 0.049, 95% confidence interval = 0.650-0.842).

CONCLUSION

HOPE+ demonstrates promising psychometric properties. It helps to assess palliative care issues of patients in neurological settings and, in combination with the 12-SQ, conceivably conditions when to initiate the palliative care approach in a population underrepresented in palliative care structures so far.

摘要

背景

将姑息治疗及其结构纳入神经科患者的治疗中越来越受到关注。然而,在德国,尚无全面的评估工具来捕捉晚期神经疾病患者的症状。

目的

验证一种新开发的姑息治疗测量工具,该工具基于经过验证的核心文档系统姑息治疗和临终关怀评估(Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation,HOPE+)的扩展,考虑到其他神经学问题。

设计

前瞻性、观察性研究,在神经康复科新入院的患者中使用 HOPE+,并以外科协作组(ECOG)表现状态和 12 个月“惊喜”问题(12-SQ)为外部标准,评估其结构效度和诊断准确性。

地点/参与者:年龄在 18-100 岁的 Dr. Becker Rhein-Sieg-Clinic 神经康复科所有新入院患者(DRKS00010947)。

结果

对 263 名患者(63±14 岁)的数据进行了分析。HOPE+显示出中度相关的六因素结构( = -0.543-0.525)。使用 ECOG 作为外部标准进行相关性分析以评估判别效度的结果很高(s(261) = 0.724, < 0.001),并且通过添加 12-SQ 对病情严重的患者进行了验证(“否”-组:48.00±14.92 vs “是”-组:18.67±7.57, < 0.009)。操作特征显示出令人满意的诊断准确性(曲线下面积:0.746 ± 0.049,95%置信区间 = 0.650-0.842)。

结论

HOPE+显示出有前途的心理测量学特性。它有助于评估神经科患者的姑息治疗问题,并且与 12-SQ 结合使用,可以设想在目前姑息治疗结构代表性不足的人群中何时开始姑息治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Validation of a palliative care outcome measurement tool supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+): Identification of palliative concerns of neurological patients.验证一种补充了神经症状的姑息治疗结果测量工具(HOPE+):确定神经疾病患者的姑息治疗关注点。
Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1221-1231. doi: 10.1177/0269216319861927. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
2
The "Surprise Question" in Neurorehabilitation-Prognosis Estimation by Neurologist and Palliative Care Physician; a Longitudinal, Prospective, Observational Study.神经科医生和姑息治疗医生在神经康复预后评估中的“意外问题”;一项纵向、前瞻性观察研究。
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 24;9:792. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00792. eCollection 2018.
3
Validation of the Symptom and Problem Checklist of the German Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE).德国临终关怀和姑息治疗评估(HOPE)症状和问题清单的验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Mar;43(3):593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.021. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
4
Evaluation of the palliative symptom burden score (PSBS) in a specialised palliative care unit of a university medical centre - a longitudinal study.评价大学医学中心专科姑息治疗病房的姑息症状负担评分(PSBS)-一项纵向研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jul 7;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0342-0.
5
Development and psychometric validation of the family-centered multidimensional outcome measure for pediatric palliative care targeted to children with severe neurological impairmentis-A multicenter prospective study.针对患有严重神经功能障碍儿童的儿科姑息治疗的以家庭为中心的多维结局测量工具的开发与心理测量学验证——一项多中心前瞻性研究
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):611-620. doi: 10.1177/0269216320975626. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
6
Palliative Performance Scale: cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation for Polish hospice setting.缓和医疗表现量表:波兰临终关怀环境下的跨文化适应和心理测量学验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 22;19(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00563-8.
7
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
8
Utility of the NECPAL CCOMS-ICO tool and the Surprise Question as screening tools for early palliative care and to predict mortality in patients with advanced chronic conditions: A cohort study.NECPAL CCOMS-ICO 工具和意外问题作为早期姑息治疗的筛选工具以及预测晚期慢性疾病患者死亡率的效用:一项队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):754-763. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676647. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Validation of the Polish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 15 - Palliative Care in patients with advanced cancer.验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷 - 核心 15 问卷 - 晚期癌症患者姑息治疗的波兰语版本。
Palliat Med. 2013 May;27(5):470-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216312458823. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Validation of the German Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for Informal Caregivers (QODD-D-Ang).非正式照料者死亡与临终质量问卷德文版(QODD-D-Ang)的验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Sep;50(3):402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients Who Need Palliative Care on the Neurology Ward.神经内科病房中需要姑息治疗的患者。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Oct 7;119(40):681-682. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0199.
2
The First Neuropalliative Care Unit in Germany-Characteristics of Patients.德国首个神经姑息治疗单元——患者特征
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 4;12(11):1498. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111498.
3
Communication, Coordination, and Security for People with Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): a randomised phase II clinical trial protocol.多发性硬化症患者的沟通、协调和安全(COCOS-MS):一项随机的 II 期临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):e049300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049300.
4
Causes for Emergency Hospitalization of Neurological Patients With Palliative Care Needs.有姑息治疗需求的神经科患者紧急住院的原因。
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 2;12:674114. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.674114. eCollection 2021.