Suppr超能文献

利斯库珠单抗与阿达木单抗治疗中重度斑块型银屑病患者的疗效比较(IMMvent):一项随机、双盲、活性对照的 3 期临床试验。

Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Translational Research in Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and Skinflammation Center, Hamburg, Germany.

School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Dermatology and Probity Medical Research, Peterborough, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 2019 Aug 17;394(10198):576-586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30952-3. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease that affects approximately 100 million people worldwide, and is a disease that can be ameliorated by anti-cytokine treatment. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of risankizumab with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

IMMvent was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled trial completed at 66 clinics in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 using interactive response technology to receive 150 mg risankizumab subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4 or 80 mg adalimumab subcutaneously at randomisation, then 40 mg at weeks 1, 3, 5, and every other week thereafter during a 16-week double-blind treatment period (part A). For weeks 16-44 (part B), adalimumab intermediate responders were re-randomised 1:1 to continue 40 mg adalimumab or switch to 150 mg risankizumab. In part A, participants and investigators were masked to study treatment. Randomisation was stratified by weight and previous tumour necrosis factor inhibitor exposure. Co-primary endpoints in part A were a 90% improvement from baseline (PASI 90) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16, and for part B was PASI 90 at week 44 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02694523.

FINDINGS

Between March 31, 2016, and Aug 24, 2017, 605 patients were randomly assigned to receive either risankizumab (n=301, 50%) or adalimumab (n=304, 50%). 294 (98%) of patients in the risankizumab group and 291 (96%) in the adalimumab group completed part A, and 51 (96%) of 53 patients re-randomised to risankizumab and 51 (91%) of 56 patients re-randomised to continue adalimumab completed part B. At week 16, PASI 90 was achieved in 218 (72%) of 301 patients given risankizumab and 144 (47%) of 304 patients given adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 24·9% [95% CI 17·5-32·4]; p<0·0001), and sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were achieved in 252 (84%) patients given risankizumab and 252 (60%) patients given adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 23·3% [16·6-30·1]; p<0·0001). In part B, among adalimumab intermediate responders, PASI 90 was achieved by 35 (66%) of 53 patients switched to risankizumab and 12 (21%) of 56 patients continuing adalimumab (adjusted absolute difference 45·0% [28·9-61·1]; p<0·0001) at week 44. Adverse events were reported in 168 (56%) of 301 patients given risankizumab and 179 (57%) of 304 patients given adalimumab in part A, and among adalimumab intermediate responders, adverse events were reported in 40 (75%) of 53 patients who switched to risankizumab and 37 (66%) of 56 patients who continued adalimumab in part B.

INTERPRETATION

Risankizumab showed significantly greater efficacy than adalimumab in providing skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. No additional safety concerns were identified for patients who switched from adalimumab to risankizumab. Treatment with risankizumab provides flexibility in the long-term treatment of psoriasis.

FUNDING

AbbVie and Boehringer Ingelheim.

摘要

背景

银屑病是一种影响全球约 1 亿人的自身免疫性疾病,可通过抗细胞因子治疗得到改善。我们旨在比较 risankizumab 与阿达木单抗在中重度斑块状银屑病患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

IMMVent 是一项在 11 个国家的 66 个临床中心进行的 3 期、随机、双盲、活性对照临床试验。符合条件的患者为年龄在 18 岁或以上、患有中重度慢性斑块状银屑病的成年人。患者使用交互式反应技术以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受 risankizumab(150mg 皮下注射,在第 0 周和第 4 周或第 8 周)或阿达木单抗(80mg 皮下注射,随机分配),然后在 16 周的双盲治疗期内每 4 周皮下注射 40mg(第 A 部分)。在第 16-44 周(第 B 部分),阿达木单抗中效应答者以 1:1 的比例重新随机分配,继续接受 40mg 阿达木单抗或转换为 150mg risankizumab。在第 A 部分中,参与者和研究者对研究治疗保持盲态。随机分配按体重和以前是否使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂进行分层。第 A 部分的主要联合终点是从基线改善 90%(PASI90)和第 16 周时静态医生总体评估(sPGA)评分 0 或 1,第 B 部分的终点是第 44 周时 PASI90(非应答者插补)。疗效分析在意向治疗人群中进行,安全性分析在安全性人群中进行(所有接受至少一剂研究药物或安慰剂的患者)。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02694523。

结果

在 2016 年 3 月 31 日至 2017 年 8 月 24 日期间,605 名患者被随机分配接受 risankizumab(n=301,50%)或阿达木单抗(n=304,50%)。在 risankizumab 组的 294 名(98%)患者和阿达木单抗组的 291 名(96%)患者完成了第 A 部分,在第 B 部分中,重新随机分配至 risankizumab 的 51 名(96%)患者和继续接受阿达木单抗的 51 名(91%)患者完成了第 B 部分。在第 16 周时,接受 risankizumab 的 301 名患者中有 218 名(72%)达到 PASI90,接受阿达木单抗的 304 名患者中有 144 名(47%)达到 PASI90(调整后的绝对差异 24.9%[95%CI 17.5-32.4];p<0.0001),接受 risankizumab 的 301 名患者中有 252 名(84%)达到 sPGA 评分 0 或 1,接受阿达木单抗的 304 名患者中有 252 名(60%)达到 sPGA 评分 0 或 1(调整后的绝对差异 23.3%[16.6-30.1];p<0.0001)。在第 B 部分中,阿达木单抗中效应答者中,53 名转换至 risankizumab 的患者中有 35 名(66%)达到 PASI90,56 名继续接受阿达木单抗的患者中有 12 名(21%)达到 PASI90(调整后的绝对差异 45.0%[28.9-61.1];p<0.0001)。在第 A 部分中,接受 risankizumab 的 301 名患者中有 168 名(56%)和接受阿达木单抗的 304 名患者中有 179 名(57%)报告了不良事件,在第 B 部分中,阿达木单抗中效应答者中,转换至 risankizumab 的 53 名患者中有 40 名(75%)和继续接受阿达木单抗的 56 名患者中有 37 名(66%)报告了不良事件。

结论

与阿达木单抗相比,risankizumab 在中重度斑块状银屑病患者中提供皮肤清除方面显示出显著更高的疗效。对于从阿达木单抗转换至 risankizumab 的患者,未发现额外的安全性问题。使用 risankizumab 进行长期治疗为银屑病提供了灵活性。

资助

艾伯维公司和勃林格殷格翰公司。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验