Verboom Michiel C, Gelderblom Hans, Kerst J Martijn, Steeghs Neeltje, Reyners Anna K L, Sleijfer Stefan, van der Graaf Winette T A, van den Hout Wilbert B
Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sarcoma. 2019 Jun 2;2019:3234205. doi: 10.1155/2019/3234205. eCollection 2019.
Trabectedin and ifosfamide are among the few cytostatic agents active in advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Trabectedin is most potent against so-called L-sarcomas (leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma). The survival gain and cost-effectiveness of these agents in a second-line setting were analysed in the setting of advanced STS after failure of anthracyclines. A prospective observational trial had previously been performed to assess the use of trabectedin in a Dutch real-world setting. Data on ifosfamide monotherapy were acquired from previous studies, and an indirect comparison of survival was made. A state-transition economic model was constructed, in which patients could be in mutually exclusive states of being preprogression, postprogression, or deceased. The costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for both treatments were assessed from a Dutch health-care perspective. Separate analyses for the group of L-sarcomas and non-L-sarcomas were performed. Trabectedin treatment resulted in a median progression-free survival of 5.2 months for L-sarcoma patients, 2.0 months for non-L-sarcoma patients, and a median overall survival of 11.8 and 6.0 months, respectively. For L-sarcoma patients, trabectedin offered an increase of 0.368 life years and 0.251 QALYs compared to ifosfamide and €20,082 in additional costs, for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €80,000 per QALY gained. In the non-L-sarcoma patients, trabectedin resulted in 0.413 less life years and 0.266 less QALYs, at the increased cost of €4,698. The difference in survival between drugs and the acquisition costs of trabectedin were the main influences in these models. Trabectedin was shown to have antitumour efficacy in advanced L-sarcoma. From a health economics perspective, the costs per QALY gained compared to ifosfamide monotherapy that may be acceptable, considering what is currently regarded as acceptable in the Netherlands.
曲贝替定和异环磷酰胺是少数对晚期软组织肉瘤(STS)有效的细胞毒性药物。曲贝替定对所谓的L型肉瘤(平滑肌肉瘤和脂肪肉瘤)最有效。在蒽环类药物治疗失败后的晚期STS背景下,分析了这些药物在二线治疗中的生存获益和成本效益。此前曾进行过一项前瞻性观察性试验,以评估曲贝替定在荷兰真实世界中的使用情况。异环磷酰胺单药治疗的数据来自以前的研究,并对生存情况进行了间接比较。构建了一个状态转换经济模型,其中患者可能处于进展前、进展后或死亡的相互排斥状态。从荷兰医疗保健的角度评估了两种治疗方法的成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。对L型肉瘤组和非L型肉瘤组进行了单独分析。曲贝替定治疗使L型肉瘤患者的中位无进展生存期为5.2个月,非L型肉瘤患者为2.0个月,中位总生存期分别为11.8个月和6.0个月。对于L型肉瘤患者,与异环磷酰胺相比,曲贝替定可增加0.368个生命年和0.251个QALY,但额外成本为20,082欧元,每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)为80,000欧元。在非L型肉瘤患者中,曲贝替定导致生命年减少0.413个,QALY减少0.266个,成本增加4,698欧元。药物之间的生存差异和曲贝替定的购置成本是这些模型中的主要影响因素。结果表明,曲贝替定在晚期L型肉瘤中具有抗肿瘤疗效。从卫生经济学角度来看,与异环磷酰胺单药治疗相比,每获得一个QALY的成本在荷兰目前认为可接受的范围内可能是可以接受的。