Suppr超能文献

重症监护环境下严重烧伤后的预防性抗凝治疗。

Prophylactic anti-coagulation after severe burn injury in critical care settings.

作者信息

Blake Megan, Roadley-Battin Ruth, Torlinski Tomasz

机构信息

College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Acta Med Litu. 2019;26(1):38-45. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v26i1.3954.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severely burnt patients are at an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, hence sufficient prophylactic anticoagulation is of paramount importance. Local guidelines at the Burns Centre in the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham therefore advise increasing the standard dose of low molecular weight heparin in these patients. An audit was carried out to assess the current practice in burns patients to ensure adequate anticoagulation and adherence to guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data was collected on all burns patients in the Burns Centre over a two-year period. The main objectives were to assess:anticoagulation regimes prescribed to severe burns patientsmonitoring of Anti-Factor Xa levelsadjustment of dosing based on the resultsThe locally produced trust guidelines were used as the comparator.

RESULTS

All burns patients were prescribed anticoagulation, but often the dose was not increased as suggested in the guidelines. Although most of the severely burnt patients were prescribed adjusted higher doses of anti-coagulation, only 60% of these patients were monitored with Anti-Factor Xa assays. Of these assays, 66% showed sub-prophylactic levels. The majority of results led to the adjustment of the dose of anticoagulant. However, often dose changes were made late.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The audit confirmed the need for increased doses of prophylactic anticoagulation in severe burns. The better adherence to the guidelines can be achieved by additional training and implementation of decision support via electronic prescribing system.

摘要

背景

严重烧伤患者发生血栓栓塞并发症的风险增加,因此充分的预防性抗凝至关重要。伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院烧伤中心的当地指南因此建议增加这些患者低分子量肝素的标准剂量。开展了一项审核,以评估烧伤患者目前的治疗情况,确保充分抗凝并遵守指南。

材料与方法

收集了烧伤中心两年内所有烧伤患者的回顾性数据。主要目的是评估:

  • 为严重烧伤患者规定的抗凝方案

  • 抗Xa因子水平的监测

  • 根据结果调整剂量

将当地制定的信托指南用作比较标准。

结果

所有烧伤患者均接受了抗凝治疗,但剂量通常未按指南建议增加。虽然大多数严重烧伤患者接受了调整后的较高剂量抗凝治疗,但这些患者中只有60%接受了抗Xa因子检测监测。在这些检测中,66%显示低于预防水平。大多数结果导致了抗凝剂剂量的调整。然而,剂量变化往往较晚才进行。

讨论与结论

审核证实严重烧伤患者需要增加预防性抗凝剂量。通过额外培训和通过电子处方系统实施决策支持,可以更好地遵守指南。

相似文献

1
Prophylactic anti-coagulation after severe burn injury in critical care settings.
Acta Med Litu. 2019;26(1):38-45. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v26i1.3954.
2
Anti-Xa guided enoxaparin dose adjustment improves pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in burn patients.
Burns. 2019 Jun;45(4):818-824. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Thromboprophylaxis in adult and paediatric burn patients: A survey of practice in the United Kingdom.
Burns. 2019 Sep;45(6):1379-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 10.
7
Association of Anti-Factor Xa-Guided Dosing of Enoxaparin With Venous Thromboembolism After Trauma.
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):144-149. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3787.
8
Evaluation of an enoxaparin dosing calculator using burn size and weight.
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):621-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a2a855.
9
Venous thromboembolism in burns patients: Are we underestimating the risk and underdosing our prophylaxis?
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Aug;74(8):1814-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.011. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
10
Weight-adjusted dosing of tinzaparin in pregnancy.
Thromb Res. 2013 Feb;131(2):e71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Heparin resistance in severe thermal injury: A prospective cohort study.
Burns Trauma. 2021 Oct 20;9:tkab032. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab032. eCollection 2021.
3
Burn care strategy in the covid-19 pandemic: a narrative review study.
Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):289-295. eCollection 2021.
4
Burn management during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations and considerations.
Avicenna J Med. 2020 Oct 13;10(4):163-173. doi: 10.4103/ajm.ajm_153_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty: an independent predictor of burns mortality following in-patient admission.
Burns. 2018 Dec;44(8):1895-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review.
Burns. 2017 Mar;43(2):249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
3
Outcomes Following the Use of Nebulized Heparin for Inhalation Injury (HIHI Study).
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000439.
6
Hypercoagulability after burn injury.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):37-43; discussion 43. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182984911.
9
Enoxaparin and antifactor Xa levels in acute burn patients.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318204b346.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验