Covington Herbert E, Newman Emily L, Leonard Michael Z, Miczek Klaus A
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, 530 Boston Ave, 02155, MA, USA.
Department of Neuroscience, Tufts University, Boston, 136 Harrison Ave, 02111, MA, USA.
F1000Res. 2019 Jun 25;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18883.1. eCollection 2019.
Aggression is a phylogenetically stable behavior, and attacks on conspecifics are observed in most animal species. In this review, we discuss translational models as they relate to pathological forms of offensive aggression and the brain mechanisms that underlie these behaviors. Quantifiable escalations in attack or the development of an atypical sequence of attacks and threats is useful for characterizing abnormal variations in aggression across species. Aggression that serves as a reinforcer can be excessive, and certain schedules of reinforcement that allow aggression rewards also allow for examining brain and behavior during the anticipation of a fight. Ethological attempts to capture and measure offensive aggression point to two prominent hypotheses for the neural basis of violence. First, pathological aggression may be due to an exaggeration of activity in subcortical circuits that mediate adaptive aggressive behaviors as they are triggered by environmental or endogenous cues at vulnerable time points. Indeed, repeated fighting experiences occur with plasticity in brain areas once considered hardwired. Alternatively, a separate "violence network" may converge on aggression circuitry that disinhibits pathological aggression (for example, via disrupted cortical inhibition). Advancing animal models that capture the motivation to commit pathological aggression remains important to fully distinguish the neural architecture of violence as it differs from adaptive competition among conspecifics.
攻击行为是一种在系统发育上稳定的行为,在大多数动物物种中都能观察到对同种个体的攻击。在这篇综述中,我们讨论与攻击性攻击的病理形式相关的转化模型以及这些行为背后的脑机制。攻击行为中可量化的升级或非典型攻击和威胁序列的发展,对于表征跨物种攻击行为的异常变化很有用。作为强化物的攻击行为可能会过度,某些允许攻击行为得到奖励的强化程序也有助于在预期战斗期间研究大脑和行为。行为学上捕捉和测量攻击性攻击行为的尝试指向了关于暴力神经基础的两个突出假说。首先,病理性攻击可能是由于介导适应性攻击行为的皮层下回路活动过度,这些行为在脆弱的时间点由环境或内源性线索触发。事实上,反复的战斗经历会伴随着曾经被认为是固定不变的脑区的可塑性变化。或者,一个独立的“暴力网络”可能会汇聚到抑制病理性攻击的攻击回路(例如,通过破坏皮层抑制)上。推进能够捕捉病理性攻击动机的动物模型对于充分区分暴力的神经结构仍然很重要,因为它不同于同种个体之间的适应性竞争。