Jansen Jeffrey W, Linneman Travis W, Tan Xing, Moenster Ryan P
Pharmacy Department, SCL Health Saint Vincent Healthcare, Billings, Montana.
Pharmacy Service, VA St Louis Health Care System, Missouri.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 13;6(7):ofz279. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz279. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Little information is available on the relative tolerability of ceftaroline versus other cephalosporins in clinical practice. We sought to compare adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with ceftaroline with those associated with ceftriaxone in hospitalized patients.
This was a retrospective, single-center matched cohort (according to age, indication, and duration) study of patients treated with ceftaroline or ceftriaxone at the VA St Louis Health Care System between 29 October 2010 and 28 March 2017, to compare rates of ADRs between the agents. Patients included received ≥2 doses of either medication to treat osteomyelitis, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, blood stream infection, pneumonia, infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, prosthetic joint infection, or empyema. The primary and secondary outcomes were the composite of any ADR during therapy and any ADR leading to premature discontinuation of therapy. The ADRs evaluated included rash, neutropenia, acute kidney injury, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and hyperbilirubinemia.
After matching, 50 patients per group were included and analyzed. An ADR occurred in 20% (10 of 50) of patients treated with ceftriaxone and 16% (8 of 50) of those treated with ceftaroline ( = .60). Two percent (1 of 50) of those treated with ceftriaxone and 16% (8 of 50) treated with ceftaroline had therapy discontinued owing to an ADR ( = .03). The most common ADR was eosinophilia (3 of 50) in the ceftriaxone group and rash (5 of 50) in the ceftaroline group. Ceftaroline therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for an ADR requiring premature discontinuation (odds ratio, 10.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-87.8; = .03).
Although there was no difference in the rates of ADRs between patients in the ceftriaxone and ceftaroline groups, significantly more ceftaroline-treated patients required premature discontinuation.
在临床实践中,关于头孢洛林与其他头孢菌素相对耐受性的信息较少。我们试图比较住院患者中与头孢洛林相关的药物不良反应(ADR)和与头孢曲松相关的药物不良反应。
这是一项回顾性、单中心匹配队列(根据年龄、适应症和病程)研究,研究对象为2010年10月29日至2017年3月28日期间在圣路易斯退伍军人医疗保健系统接受头孢洛林或头孢曲松治疗的患者,以比较这两种药物的ADR发生率。纳入的患者接受了≥2剂的两种药物之一,用于治疗骨髓炎、急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染、血流感染、肺炎、感染性心内膜炎、化脓性关节炎、人工关节感染或脓胸。主要和次要结局是治疗期间任何ADR以及导致治疗提前终止的任何ADR的综合情况。评估的ADR包括皮疹、中性粒细胞减少、急性肾损伤、嗜酸性粒细胞增多、血小板减少、转氨酶升高和高胆红素血症。
匹配后,每组纳入50例患者进行分析。接受头孢曲松治疗的患者中有20%(50例中的10例)发生ADR,接受头孢洛林治疗的患者中有16%(50例中的8例)发生ADR(P = 0.60)。接受头孢曲松治疗的患者中有2%(50例中的1例)因ADR而停药,接受头孢洛林治疗的患者中有16%(50例中的8例)因ADR而停药(P = 0.03)。最常见的ADR在头孢曲松组中是嗜酸性粒细胞增多(50例中的3例),在头孢洛林组中是皮疹(50例中的5例)。头孢洛林治疗被确定为需要提前终止治疗的ADR的独立危险因素(比值比,10.2;95%置信区间,1.19 - 87.8;P = 0.03)。
虽然头孢曲松组和头孢洛林组患者的ADR发生率没有差异,但接受头孢洛林治疗的患者中需要提前终止治疗的明显更多。