Suppr超能文献

头孢洛林或头孢曲松治疗患者的药物不良反应比较:一项单中心匹配队列研究。

Comparison of Adverse Drug Reactions Between Patients Treated With Ceftaroline or Ceftriaxone: A Single-Center, Matched Cohort Study.

作者信息

Jansen Jeffrey W, Linneman Travis W, Tan Xing, Moenster Ryan P

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, SCL Health Saint Vincent Healthcare, Billings, Montana.

Pharmacy Service, VA St Louis Health Care System, Missouri.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 13;6(7):ofz279. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz279. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little information is available on the relative tolerability of ceftaroline versus other cephalosporins in clinical practice. We sought to compare adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with ceftaroline with those associated with ceftriaxone in hospitalized patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center matched cohort (according to age, indication, and duration) study of patients treated with ceftaroline or ceftriaxone at the VA St Louis Health Care System between 29 October 2010 and 28 March 2017, to compare rates of ADRs between the agents. Patients included received ≥2 doses of either medication to treat osteomyelitis, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, blood stream infection, pneumonia, infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, prosthetic joint infection, or empyema. The primary and secondary outcomes were the composite of any ADR during therapy and any ADR leading to premature discontinuation of therapy. The ADRs evaluated included rash, neutropenia, acute kidney injury, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and hyperbilirubinemia.

RESULTS

After matching, 50 patients per group were included and analyzed. An ADR occurred in 20% (10 of 50) of patients treated with ceftriaxone and 16% (8 of 50) of those treated with ceftaroline ( = .60). Two percent (1 of 50) of those treated with ceftriaxone and 16% (8 of 50) treated with ceftaroline had therapy discontinued owing to an ADR ( = .03). The most common ADR was eosinophilia (3 of 50) in the ceftriaxone group and rash (5 of 50) in the ceftaroline group. Ceftaroline therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for an ADR requiring premature discontinuation (odds ratio, 10.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-87.8; = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no difference in the rates of ADRs between patients in the ceftriaxone and ceftaroline groups, significantly more ceftaroline-treated patients required premature discontinuation.

摘要

背景

在临床实践中,关于头孢洛林与其他头孢菌素相对耐受性的信息较少。我们试图比较住院患者中与头孢洛林相关的药物不良反应(ADR)和与头孢曲松相关的药物不良反应。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性、单中心匹配队列(根据年龄、适应症和病程)研究,研究对象为2010年10月29日至2017年3月28日期间在圣路易斯退伍军人医疗保健系统接受头孢洛林或头孢曲松治疗的患者,以比较这两种药物的ADR发生率。纳入的患者接受了≥2剂的两种药物之一,用于治疗骨髓炎、急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染、血流感染、肺炎、感染性心内膜炎、化脓性关节炎、人工关节感染或脓胸。主要和次要结局是治疗期间任何ADR以及导致治疗提前终止的任何ADR的综合情况。评估的ADR包括皮疹、中性粒细胞减少、急性肾损伤、嗜酸性粒细胞增多、血小板减少、转氨酶升高和高胆红素血症。

结果

匹配后,每组纳入50例患者进行分析。接受头孢曲松治疗的患者中有20%(50例中的10例)发生ADR,接受头孢洛林治疗的患者中有16%(50例中的8例)发生ADR(P = 0.60)。接受头孢曲松治疗的患者中有2%(50例中的1例)因ADR而停药,接受头孢洛林治疗的患者中有16%(50例中的8例)因ADR而停药(P = 0.03)。最常见的ADR在头孢曲松组中是嗜酸性粒细胞增多(50例中的3例),在头孢洛林组中是皮疹(50例中的5例)。头孢洛林治疗被确定为需要提前终止治疗的ADR的独立危险因素(比值比,10.2;95%置信区间,1.19 - 87.8;P = 0.03)。

结论

虽然头孢曲松组和头孢洛林组患者的ADR发生率没有差异,但接受头孢洛林治疗的患者中需要提前终止治疗的明显更多。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Adverse Drug Reactions Between Patients Treated With Ceftaroline or Ceftriaxone: A Single-Center, Matched Cohort Study.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 13;6(7):ofz279. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz279. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Ceftaroline Use: A 2-Center Retrospective Cohort.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Rate and Incidence of Adverse Reactions Associated With Ceftaroline Exposure: Importance of Cutaneous Manifestations.
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Mar;52(3):235-239. doi: 10.1177/1060028017735629. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Ceftriaxone-induced Acute Cholecystitis.
J Med Ultrasound. 2021 May 14;29(4):288-290. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_132_20. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Tolerability of high-dose ceftriaxone in CNS infections: a prospective multicentre cohort study.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1078-1085. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky553.
2
Comparative analysis of neutropenia in patients receiving prolonged treatment with ceftaroline.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(3):772-778. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx452.
3
Rate and Incidence of Adverse Reactions Associated With Ceftaroline Exposure: Importance of Cutaneous Manifestations.
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Mar;52(3):235-239. doi: 10.1177/1060028017735629. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Multicenter Observational Study of Ceftaroline Fosamil for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02015-16. Print 2017 Feb.
6
Outpatient use of ceftaroline fosamil versus vancomycin for osteoarticular infection: a matched cohort study.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Dec;71(12):3568-3574. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw326. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
7
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Ceftaroline Use: A 2-Center Retrospective Cohort.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
8
High incidence of neutropenia in patients with prolonged ceftaroline exposure.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jul;71(7):2010-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw062. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
Neutropenia Associated with Long-Term Ceftaroline Use.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Oct 26;60(1):264-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01471-15. Print 2016 Jan.
10
Agranulocytosis with ceftaroline high-dose monotherapy or combination therapy with clindamycin.
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Jun;35(6):608-12. doi: 10.1002/phar.1596. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验