Hushie Martin
a Department of Behavioural Sciences, School of Allied Health Sciences , University for Development Studies , Tamale , Ghana.
Afr J AIDS Res. 2019 Jul;18(2):138-147. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2019.1625937.
The contribution of civil society organisations (CSOs) to national HIV/AIDS responses in sub-Saharan African countries, with Global Health Initiatives' (GHIs) funding channelled through National AIDS Commissions (NACs), is well researched. Less well understood are the governance models and funding mechanisms being used to successfully engage CSOs in the HIV/AIDS response. Using data from government, donor, CSO and documentary sources, this article characterises the organisational principles and practices and unique funding models adopted by the Ghana AIDS Commission (GAC) to effectively and efficiently engage CSOs in the HIV/AIDS response. It found four major governance principles and practices that target: 1) strategic planning for service delivery; 2) focussed expressions of interest; 3) competitive tendering and contracting for service delivery; and 4) adoption of results-based management. It also identified three predominant funding models that illustrate the application of these guiding principles to harness the inherent strengths of CSOs to more effectively respond to HIV/AIDS, namely: 1) direct funding of locally-based CSOs; 2) funding international and national NGOs to engage local CSOs in partnership; and 3) funding umbrella organisations. These findings are significant for Ghana but they may also have relevance for other low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) that have limited experience delivering HIV/AIDS services through state-civil society partnerships, as well as broader debates on the role of donors, governments and CSOs working in partnership to fight HIV/AIDS.
民间社会组织(CSO)对撒哈拉以南非洲国家全国艾滋病毒/艾滋病应对工作的贡献已得到充分研究,全球卫生倡议(GHI)的资金通过国家艾滋病委员会(NAC)提供。然而,人们对用于成功让民间社会组织参与艾滋病毒/艾滋病应对工作的治理模式和筹资机制了解较少。本文利用来自政府、捐助方、民间社会组织和文献来源的数据,描述了加纳艾滋病委员会(GAC)为有效且高效地让民间社会组织参与艾滋病毒/艾滋病应对工作所采用的组织原则、做法及独特的筹资模式。研究发现了四项主要治理原则和做法,其目标分别为:1)服务提供的战略规划;2)有针对性地表达兴趣;3)服务提供的竞争性招标和合同签订;4)采用基于结果的管理。研究还确定了三种主要筹资模式,这些模式说明了如何应用这些指导原则来利用民间社会组织的内在优势,以更有效地应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病,即:1)直接资助当地的民间社会组织;2)资助国际和国家非政府组织与当地民间社会组织建立伙伴关系;3)资助伞状组织。这些研究结果对加纳具有重要意义,但对于其他通过国家与民间社会伙伴关系提供艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务经验有限的低收入或中等收入国家(LMIC),以及关于捐助方、政府和民间社会组织合作抗击艾滋病毒/艾滋病的作用的更广泛辩论,也可能具有参考价值。