• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

营养风险指数对异基因造血细胞移植后临床结局的影响。

Impact of a Nutritional Risk Index on Clinical Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Oncology, JA Aichi Konan Kosei Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

Department of Hematology and Oncology, JA Aichi Konan Kosei Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Nov;25(11):2287-2296. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.002
PMID:31284071
Abstract

Nutritional status is an important component of cancer care, and malnutrition itself can cause death in 10% to 20% of cancer patients. A nutritional risk index (NRI) is a useful tool for nutritional assessment of cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pretransplant NRI values on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). One hundred sixty patients who underwent allo-HSCT between January 2008 and July 2017 at Konan Kosei Hospital were included in this single-center, retrospective analysis. NRI was calculated at the beginning of the conditioning regimen. The patients were divided into high NRI (NRI ≥ 97.5) and low NRI (NRI < 97.5) groups, and overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were evaluated. Two-year OS rates were 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63% to 83%) and 50.4% (95% CI, 38% to 62%) in the high NRI and low NRI groups, respectively (P < .001). One-year cumulative incidences of NRM were 7.9% (95% CI, 3.5% to 15%) and 23% (95% CI, 14% to 33%; P = .014) and 2-year cumulative relapse rates were 17% (95% CI, 10% to 26%) and 32% (95% CI, 21% to 43%; P = .10) in the high NRI and low NRI groups, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated low NRI was a significant risk factor for OS and NRM. Conversely, high NRI was associated with increased incidences of grades II to IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. Additionally, the subgroup analysis according to stem cell source revealed a significant benefit of higher NRI on survival only in umbilical cord blood recipients. Overall, these results suggest that pretransplant NRI might predict OS and NRM after allo-HSCT.

摘要

营养状况是癌症治疗的一个重要组成部分,营养不良本身可导致 10%20%的癌症患者死亡。营养风险指数(NRI)是评估癌症患者营养状况的有用工具。本研究旨在评估移植前 NRI 值对异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HSCT)结局的影响。本单中心回顾性分析纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月在日本神户圣和医院接受 allo-HSCT 的 160 例患者。在预处理方案开始时计算 NRI。将患者分为高 NRI(NRI≥97.5)和低 NRI(NRI<97.5)组,评估总生存(OS)、非复发死亡率(NRM)以及急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的累积发生率。高 NRI 和低 NRI 组的 2 年 OS 率分别为 76%(95%CI,63%83%)和 50.4%(95%CI,38%62%)(P<0.001)。高 NRI 和低 NRI 组的 1 年 NRM 累积发生率分别为 7.9%(95%CI,3.5%15%)和 23%(95%CI,14%33%;P=0.014),2 年累积复发率分别为 17%(95%CI,10%26%)和 32%(95%CI,21%~43%;P=0.10)。多变量分析表明,低 NRI 是 OS 和 NRM 的显著危险因素。相反,高 NRI 与 II 至 IV 级急性 GVHD 和慢性 GVHD 的发生率增加有关。此外,根据干细胞来源的亚组分析,仅在脐带血受者中,较高的 NRI 与生存获益相关。总体而言,这些结果表明,移植前 NRI 可能预测 allo-HSCT 后的 OS 和 NRM。

相似文献

1
Impact of a Nutritional Risk Index on Clinical Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.营养风险指数对异基因造血细胞移植后临床结局的影响。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Nov;25(11):2287-2296. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
2
Geriatric nutritional risk index as a useful prognostic factor in second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.老年营养风险指数作为二次异基因造血干细胞移植中有用的预后因素。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Jul;99(7):1655-1665. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04089-0. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Absolute lymphocyte count recovery after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predicts clinical outcome.异基因造血干细胞移植后绝对淋巴细胞计数的恢复可预测临床结局。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 May;21(5):873-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
A Comparison of the Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen Fludarabine/Busulfan with Cyclophosphamide/Total Body Irradiation, for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Modern Era: A Cohort Analysis.在现代时代,异体干细胞移植中氟达拉滨/白消安与环磷酰胺/全身照射的清髓性调理方案比较:队列分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Aug;24(8):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
5
Outcomes of Haploidentical Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: An EBMT/CIBMTR Report.Haploidentical 移植治疗复发性多发性骨髓瘤患者的结果:EBMT/CIBMTR 报告。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Feb;25(2):335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Transplantation from matched siblings using once-daily intravenous busulfan/fludarabine with thymoglobulin: a myeloablative regimen with low nonrelapse mortality in all but older patients with high-risk disease.使用每日一次静脉注射白消安/氟达拉滨联合抗胸腺细胞球蛋白进行同胞全相合移植:一种除高危疾病老年患者外非复发死亡率较低的清髓性方案。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Aug;14(8):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.05.010.
7
Analysis of non-relapse mortality and causes of death over 15 years following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.异基因造血干细胞移植后15年非复发死亡率及死亡原因分析。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Apr;51(4):553-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.330. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
Comparison of two pretransplant predictive models and a flexible HCT-CI using different cut off points to determine low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups: the flexible HCT-CI Is the best predictor of NRM and OS in a population of patients undergoing allo-RIC.比较两种移植前预测模型和使用不同截断点的灵活 HCT-CI,以确定低、中、高危组:在接受 allo-RIC 的患者人群中,灵活 HCT-CI 是 NRM 和 OS 的最佳预测因子。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Mar;16(3):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
9
Atorvastatin for the Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Patients Undergoing HLA-Matched Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HCT).阿托伐他汀用于预防接受人类白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配的相关供体异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HCT)患者的急性移植物抗宿主病
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan;22(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.07.034. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Comparison of outcomes after two standards-of-care reduced-intensity conditioning regimens and two different graft sources for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with hematologic diseases: a single-center analysis.两种标准的降低强度预处理方案和两种不同移植物来源在血液病成人患者异基因干细胞移植中的疗效比较:一项单中心分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jun;19(6):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of nutritional risk assessment indices in patients with digestive system tumors.营养风险评估指标在消化系统肿瘤患者中的预后价值。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):1385. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14823-4.
2
Association of the nutritional risk index recorded prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with the clinical prognosis in children.异基因造血细胞移植前记录的营养风险指数与儿童临床预后的相关性
EJHaem. 2024 Dec 18;6(1):e1054. doi: 10.1002/jha2.1054. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
An Analysis of Preoperative Inflammatory Indicators That Influence the Drainage Tube Retention Time in Patients with Breast Cancer Surgery.
影响乳腺癌手术患者引流管留置时间的术前炎症指标分析
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Mar 6;16:91-103. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S447933. eCollection 2024.
4
The Critical Exploration into Current Evidence behind the Role of the Nutritional Support in Adult Patients Who Undergo Haematogenic Stem Cell Transplantation.成人血液系统干细胞移植患者营养支持作用的当前证据的批判性探索。
Nutrients. 2023 Aug 11;15(16):3558. doi: 10.3390/nu15163558.
5
Relationship Between Pretransplantation Nutritional Status and Outcome in Adults with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.异基因造血细胞移植治疗成人急性髓系白血病患者移植前营养状况与结局的关系。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Dec;28(12):846.e1-846.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.09.023. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
A Prognostic Model Based on Nutritional Risk Index in Operative Breast Cancer.基于营养风险指数的手术乳腺癌预后模型。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 14;14(18):3783. doi: 10.3390/nu14183783.
7
Nutritional Risk Index as a Prognostic Factor Predicts the Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Stage III Gastric Cancer.营养风险指数作为一种预后因素可预测Ⅲ期胃癌患者的临床结局。
Front Oncol. 2022 May 13;12:880419. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.880419. eCollection 2022.