Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, and The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Assistant Professor, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;217(3):491-497. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.161.
Little is known about long-term employment outcomes for patients with first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum (FES) disorders who received early intervention services.
We compared the 10-year employment trajectory of patients with FES who received early intervention services with those who received standard care. Factors differentiating the employment trajectories were explored.
Patients with FES (N = 145) who received early intervention services in Hong Kong between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2002 were matched with those who entered standard care 1 year previously. We used hierarchical clustering analysis to explore the 10-year employment clusters for both groups. We used the mixed model test to compare cluster memberships and piecewise regression analysis to compare the employment trajectories of the two groups.
There were significantly more patients who received the early intervention service in the good employment cluster (early intervention: N = 98 [67.6%]; standard care: N = 76 [52.4%]; P = 0.009). In the poor employment cluster, there was a significant difference in the longitudinal pattern between early intervention and standard care for years 1-5 (P < 0.0001). The number of relapses during the first 3 years, months of full-time employment during the first year and years of education were significant in differentiating the clusters of the early intervention group.
Results suggest there was an overall long-term benefit of early intervention services on employment. However, the benefit was not sustained for all patients. Personalisation of the duration of the early intervention service with a focus on relapse prevention and early vocational reintegration should be considered for service enhancement.
对于首发精神分裂谱系障碍(FES)患者接受早期干预服务后的长期就业结果知之甚少。
我们比较了接受早期干预服务和标准护理的 FES 患者的 10 年就业轨迹。探讨了区分就业轨迹的因素。
2001 年 7 月 1 日至 2002 年 6 月 30 日期间在香港接受早期干预服务的 FES 患者(N=145)与 1 年前进入标准护理的患者相匹配。我们使用分层聚类分析来探索两组的 10 年就业聚类。我们使用混合模型检验比较聚类成员,使用分段回归分析比较两组的就业轨迹。
接受早期干预服务的患者在良好就业聚类中明显更多(早期干预:N=98[67.6%];标准护理:N=76[52.4%];P=0.009)。在不良就业聚类中,早期干预和标准护理在第 1-5 年的纵向模式存在显著差异(P<0.0001)。第 1 年的复发次数、全职工作月数和受教育年限在区分早期干预组的聚类方面具有显著意义。
结果表明早期干预服务对就业有总体的长期益处。然而,并非所有患者都能持续受益。应考虑个性化早期干预服务的持续时间,重点预防复发和早期职业再融入,以增强服务。