Reicks Veterinary Research & Consulting, P.O. Box 314, St. Peter, Minnesota, 56082, USA.
Theriogenology. 2019 Oct 1;137:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.041. Epub 2019 May 31.
Protecting boar studs and their clients from emerging infectious disease first involves effective biosecurity measures to keep a disease out that was not present, and second, early identification and ceasing semen distribution prior to disseminating infectious disease. Experiences in the field can best guide us as to what has been effective. Circumstances in North America in the period of 1999-2004 resulted in numerous PRRS virus (Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome) negative boar studs becoming infected and disseminating virus to sow farms. Earlier detection methods were needed, and withholding of semen pending negative test results became standard. To accomplish this, diagnostic labs complied with industry requests for same day testing. At the same time, research efforts helped clarify the major routes of PRRS virus introduction into the farms. The risk of fomites and aerosol spread became viewed as major risks. Addressing issues with people and supply entry alone did not eliminate new virus entry. The implementation of air filtration during 2005-2008 had a major impact on the rate of new virus introductions into boar studs after other measures alone were unsuccessful. Risks exposed with the introduction of PED virus (Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea) into North America further highlighted other risk factors such as feed ingredients, trailer sanitation, and the presence of clear physical barriers. The successful adaptation of testing procedures, combined with biosecurity procedures including air filtration, has made the incidence of infectious disease introduction extremely rare in North American boar studs over the last decade. While survivability of infectious disease agents can vary in different materials or in the air, successful protocols should be applied and adjusted as needed to accommodate new information or risks. Cleary defined physical barriers for people and animal entry and exit, sanitization and/or down time on incoming supplies, risk mitigation and testing of feed ingredients, and filtration have been keys to changing the incidence of emerging infectious disease introduction into boar studs.
保护公猪站及其客户免受新发传染病的影响,首先需要采取有效的生物安全措施,防止原本不存在的疾病传入;其次,在传染病传播之前,要尽早发现并停止精液分发。我们可以从实际经验中了解到哪些措施是有效的。在 1999 年至 2004 年期间,北美的情况导致许多 PRRS 病毒(猪繁殖与呼吸综合征)阴性的公猪站受到感染,并将病毒传播给母猪场。需要更早的检测方法,在等待阴性检测结果期间暂停精液供应成为了标准做法。为了实现这一目标,诊断实验室满足了行业对当天检测的要求。与此同时,研究工作有助于澄清 PRRS 病毒进入农场的主要途径。传播媒介和气溶胶传播的风险被视为主要风险。仅解决人与物资进入的问题并不能消除新病毒的传入。在 2005 年至 2008 年期间实施空气过滤,对其他措施单独使用后仍未能阻止新病毒传入公猪站产生了重大影响。PED 病毒(猪流行性腹泻)引入北美所暴露的风险进一步强调了其他风险因素,如饲料成分、拖车卫生和明确的物理屏障。检测程序的成功调整,加上包括空气过滤在内的生物安全程序,使得过去十年北美公猪站传染病的发病率非常低。虽然传染病病原体在不同材料或空气中的存活能力可能有所不同,但应根据需要应用和调整成功的方案,以适应新的信息或风险。明确界定的人员和动物进出的物理屏障、对进入物资进行消毒和/或停机时间、风险缓解和饲料成分检测以及过滤,一直是降低新发传染病传入公猪站发病率的关键。