Dee Scott, Neill Casey, Singrey Aaron, Clement Travis, Cochrane Roger, Jones Cassandra, Patterson Gilbert, Spronk Gordon, Christopher-Hennings Jane, Nelson Eric
Pipestone Applied Research, Pipestone Veterinary Services, 1300 Box, 188 Hwy 75 S, Pipestone, MN, 56164, USA.
Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
BMC Vet Res. 2016 Mar 12;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0674-z.
This study describes a model developed to evaluate the transboundary risk of PEDV-contaminated swine feed ingredients and the effect of two mitigation strategies during a simulated transport event from China to the US.
Ingredients imported to the USA from China, including organic & conventional soybeans and meal, lysine hydrochloride, D-L methionine, tryptophan, Vitamins A, D & E, choline, carriers (rice hulls, corn cobs) and feed grade tetracycline, were inoculated with PEDV. Control ingredients, and treatments (ingredients plus a liquid antimicrobial (SalCURB, Kemin Industries (LA) or a 2% custom medium chain fatty acid blend (MCFA)) were tested. The model ran for 37 days, simulating transport of cargo from Beijing, China to Des Moines, IA, US from December 23, 2012 to January 28, 2013. To mimic conditions on land and sea, historical temperature and percent relative humidity (% RH) data were programmed into an environmental chamber which stored all containers. To evaluate PEDV viability over time, ingredients were organized into 1 of 4 batches of samples, each batch representing a specific segment of transport. Batch 1 (segment 1) simulated transport of contaminated ingredients from manufacturing plants in Beijing (day 1 post-contamination (PC)). Batch 2 (segments 1 and 2) simulated manufacturing and delivery to Shanghai, including time in Anquing terminal awaiting shipment (days 1-8 PC). Batch 3 (segments 1, 2 and 3) represented time in China, the crossing of the Pacific and entry to the US at the San Francisco, CA terminal (day 1-27 PC). Batch 4 (segments 1-4) represented the previous events, including transport to Des Moines, IA (days 1-37 PC). Across control (non-treated) ingredients, viable PEDV was detected in soybean meal (organic and conventional), Vitamin D, lysine hydrochloride and choline chloride. In contrast, viable PEDV was not detected in any samples treated with LA or MCFA.
These results demonstrate the ability of PEDV to survive in a subset of feed ingredients using a model simulating shipment from China to the US. This is proof of concept suggesting that contaminated feed ingredients could serve as transboundary risk factors for PEDV, along with the identification of effective mitigation options.
本研究描述了一个开发的模型,用于评估受猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)污染的猪饲料成分的跨境风险,以及在从中国到美国的模拟运输过程中两种缓解策略的效果。
从中国进口到美国的成分,包括有机和传统大豆及豆粕、盐酸赖氨酸、D-型蛋氨酸、色氨酸、维生素A、D和E、胆碱、载体(稻壳、玉米芯)和饲料级四环素,均接种了PEDV。对对照成分以及处理组(成分加液体抗菌剂(SalCURB,凯明工业公司(洛杉矶)或2%定制中链脂肪酸混合物(MCFA))进行了测试。该模型运行37天,模拟2012年12月23日至2013年1月28日从中国北京到美国爱荷华州得梅因的货物运输。为模拟陆地和海上条件,将历史温度和相对湿度(%RH)数据编程输入一个环境舱,该环境舱存放所有容器。为评估随时间推移PEDV的生存能力,将成分分为4批样品中的1批,每批代表运输的一个特定阶段。第1批(阶段1)模拟受污染成分从北京的生产厂运输(污染后第1天(PC))。第2批(阶段1和2)模拟生产并运至上海,包括在安庆码头等待装船的时间(污染后第1 - 8天)。第3批(阶段1、2和3)代表在中国的时间、穿越太平洋以及在加利福尼亚州旧金山码头进入美国(污染后第1 - 27天)。第4批(阶段1 - 4)代表之前的事件,包括运输至爱荷华州得梅因(污染后第1 - 37天)。在对照(未处理)成分中,在豆粕(有机和传统)、维生素D、盐酸赖氨酸和氯化胆碱中检测到了活的PEDV。相比之下,在任何用LA或MCFA处理的样品中均未检测到活的PEDV。
这些结果表明,利用模拟从中国到美国运输的模型,PEDV能够在一部分饲料成分中存活。这是一个概念验证,表明受污染的饲料成分可能成为PEDV的跨境风险因素,同时也确定了有效的缓解措施。