Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy.
J Med Virol. 2019 Nov;91(11):1937-1943. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25541. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
To describe the trajectories of the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index in a cohort of HIV-1 infected patients during their first-line antiretroviral (ART) regimen.
Retrospective analysis of naïve patients who started ART from 2007 at the Infectious Diseases Unit of the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. We included patients treated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs, tenofovir, abacavir, lamivudine or emtricitabine), and one anchor drug (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor [PI/r], non-NRTI [NNRTI], or integrase strand transfer inhibitor [InSTI]), and with HOMA-IR assessed both before and after the start of ART. Univariate and multivariate mixed linear models estimated HOMA-IR changes during ART.
Among 618 patients included in the study, 218 received InSTI-, 210 PI/r-, and 190 NNRTI-based regimens. Median follow-up was 27.4 (16.3-41.2) months. Adjusted mean change in HOMA-IR index was significantly higher (P = .041) in patients treated with InSTI-based regimens [0.160 (95% CI: 0.003-0.321) units per year] compared with NNRTI-based regimens [-0.005 (95% CI: -0.184-0.074) units per year]; no difference was observed between patients treated with NNRTI- and PI/r-based regimens or between INSTI-based and PI/r-based regimens.
InSTI-based first-line ARTs were independently associated with greater increases in HOMA-IR index.
描述一组 HIV-1 感染患者在一线抗逆转录病毒(ART)治疗期间胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)指数的轨迹。
回顾性分析 2007 年在米兰圣拉斐尔医院传染病科开始 ART 的初治患者。我们纳入了接受两种核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs,替诺福韦、阿巴卡韦、拉米夫定或恩曲他滨)和一种锚定药物(利托那韦增效蛋白酶抑制剂[PI/r]、非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂[NNRTI]或整合酶链转移抑制剂[INSTI])治疗的患者,并且在开始 ART 前后均评估了 HOMA-IR。使用单变量和多变量混合线性模型估计了 ART 期间 HOMA-IR 的变化。
在纳入的 618 例患者中,218 例接受 INSTI、210 例接受 PI/r 和 190 例接受 NNRTI 方案治疗。中位随访时间为 27.4(16.3-41.2)个月。调整后的 HOMA-IR 指数变化的平均差值在接受 INSTI 方案治疗的患者中显著更高(P=0.041)[0.160(95%CI:0.003-0.321)单位/年],与接受 NNRTI 方案治疗的患者相比[-0.005(95%CI:-0.184-0.074)单位/年];接受 NNRTI 方案和 PI/r 方案治疗的患者或接受 INSTI 方案和 PI/r 方案治疗的患者之间未观察到差异。
一线 INSTI 方案与 HOMA-IR 指数的增加独立相关。