Capacity Building Program, Makerere University Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Feb;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003136.
Whether integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are associated with a higher risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) than other antiretroviral therapies (ART) needs to be established.MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov registries were searched for studies published between 1 January 2000 and 15 June 2022. Eligible studies reported incident DM or mean changes in insulin resistance measured by Homeostatic Model for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) in patients on INSTIs compared with other ARTs. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to obtain pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.A total of 16 studies were pooled: 13 studies meta-analyzed for incident diabetes with a patient population of 72 404 and 3 for changes in HOMA-IR. INSTI therapy was associated with a lower risk of incident diabetes in 13 studies (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.96, I=29%), of which 8 randomized controlled trials demonstrated a 22% reduced risk (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96, I=0%). INSTIs had a lower risk compared with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89, I=0%) but similar to protease inhibitor-based therapy (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01, I=27%). The risk was lower in studies with longer follow-up (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, I=24%) and among ART-naïve patients (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94, I=3%) but increased in African populations (RR 2.99, 95% CI 2.53 to 3.54, I=0%).In conclusion, exposure to INSTIs was not associated with increased risk of DM, except in the African population. Stratified analyses suggested reduced risk among ART-naïve patients and studies with longer follow-up.International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42021273040.
是否整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTIs)比其他抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)更易导致 2 型糖尿病(DM),需要进一步明确。我们检索了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 15 日发表的 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册数据库中的研究。纳入的研究报告了 INSTIs 与其他 ART 相比,在患者中发生 DM 或通过稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)的平均变化。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以获得汇总的相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。共纳入 16 项研究:13 项研究通过荟萃分析纳入 72404 例患者,评估了糖尿病的发生情况,3 项研究评估了 HOMA-IR 的变化。13 项研究(RR 0.80,95%CI 0.67 至 0.96,I=29%)表明 INSTI 治疗与糖尿病发生风险降低相关,其中 8 项随机对照试验表明风险降低 22%(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.81 至 0.96,I=0%)。与非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.63 至 0.89,I=0%)相比,INSTIs 风险降低,但与基于蛋白酶抑制剂的治疗(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.61 至 1.01,I=27%)相似。在随访时间较长的研究中(RR 0.70,95%CI 0.53 至 0.94,I=24%)和在未接受 ART 治疗的患者中(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.65 至 0.94,I=3%),风险降低,但在非洲人群中(RR 2.99,95%CI 2.53 至 3.54,I=0%),风险增加。
总之,除了在非洲人群中,暴露于 INSTIs 与 DM 风险增加无关。分层分析表明,在未接受 ART 治疗的患者和随访时间较长的研究中,风险降低。国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)登记号:CRD42021273040。