Díez-León M, Kitchenham L, Duprey R, Bailey C D C, Choleris E, Lewis M, Mason G
Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, UK.
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Canada.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Nov 5;373:112056. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112056. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
Stereotypic behaviour (SB) is common in animals housed in farm, zoo or laboratory conditions, including captive Carnivora (e.g. wild ursids and felids). Neurobiological data on housing-induced SBs come from four species (macaques, two rodent species, and horses), and suggest basal ganglia (BG) dysfunction. We investigated whether similar patterns occur in Carnivora via a model, American mink, because their SB is distinctive in form and timing. We raised 32 males in non-enriched (NE) or enriched (E) cages for 2 years, and assessed two forms of SB: 1) Carnivora-typical locomotor-and-whole-body ('loco') SBs (e.g. pacing, weaving); 2) scrabbling with the forepaws. Neuronal activity was analysed via cytochrome oxidase (CO) staining of the dorsal striatum (caudate; putamen), globus pallidus (externus, GPe; internus, GPi), STN, and nucleus accumbens (NAc); and the GPe:GPi ratio (GPr) calculated to assess relative activation of direct and indirect pathways. NE mink stereotyped more, and had lower GPr CO-staining indicating relatively lower indirect pathway activation. However, no single BG area was affected by housing and nor did GPr values covary with SB. Independent of housing, elevated NAc CO-staining predicted more loco SB, while scrabbling, probably because it negatively correlated with loco SB, negatively covaried with NAc CO-staining in NE subjects. These results thus implicate the NAc in individual differences in mink SB. However, because they cannot explain why NE subjects showed more SB, they provide limited support for the BG dysfunction hypothesis for this species' housing-induced SB. More research is therefore needed to understand how barren housing causes SB in captive Carnivora.
刻板行为(SB)在饲养于农场、动物园或实验室环境中的动物中很常见,包括圈养的食肉动物(如野生熊科动物和猫科动物)。关于饲养引起的刻板行为的神经生物学数据来自四个物种(猕猴、两种啮齿动物和马),并表明基底神经节(BG)功能障碍。我们通过美国水貂这一模型来研究食肉动物中是否出现类似模式,因为它们的刻板行为在形式和时间上具有独特性。我们将32只雄性水貂饲养在非丰富(NE)或丰富(E)的笼子中两年,并评估两种刻板行为形式:1)食肉动物典型的运动和全身(“运动”)刻板行为(如踱步、迂回行走);2)用前爪抓挠。通过对背侧纹状体(尾状核;壳核)、苍白球(外侧,GPe;内侧,GPi)、丘脑底核(STN)和伏隔核(NAc)进行细胞色素氧化酶(CO)染色来分析神经元活动;并计算GPe:GPi比率(GPr)以评估直接和间接通路的相对激活情况。NE水貂表现出更多的刻板行为,且GPr CO染色较低,表明间接通路激活相对较低。然而,没有单个BG区域受到饲养的影响,GPr值也与刻板行为没有共变关系。与饲养无关,NAc CO染色升高预示着更多的运动刻板行为,而抓挠行为,可能是因为它与运动刻板行为呈负相关,在NE组中与NAc CO染色呈负共变关系。因此,这些结果表明NAc与水貂刻板行为的个体差异有关。然而,由于它们无法解释为什么NE组表现出更多的刻板行为,它们为该物种饲养引起的刻板行为的BG功能障碍假说提供了有限的支持。因此,需要更多的研究来了解贫瘠的饲养环境如何导致圈养食肉动物出现刻板行为。