Negi Gunjan, Chitra Prasad
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):280-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
To evaluate relationships between frontal cephalograms and photographic measurements of Indian population with anthropometric measurements and if frontal photographic analysis could be utilized with precision for orthodontic diagnosis.
A cross-sectional ex vivo study was conducted on 300 subjects with age range of 18-25yrs. Standardized frontal cephalograms and photographs were obtained for all subjects and were analysed with Nemoceph 10.4.2 (Nemotec Dental Systems, Madrid, Spain) software program. Linear anthropometric measurements were recorded with the help of a digital Vernier caliper. 21 linear measurements were made, of which 10 were horizontal and 11 were vertical. Repeated measures of ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's Post hoc Analysis was used to compare mean values of horizontal and vertical parameters between 3 different methods. The level of significance was set at < 0.05.
Statistically significant differences were found with most parameters. Between the analogous photographic, cephalometric and anthropometric measurements, only N'-Me' showed reliability with all three methods (0.53,0.53,0.53).
The photographic method has proven to be a repeatable and reproducible tool for only few parameters. Therefore, it cannot be considered a reliable diagnostic tool.
评估印度人群的头颅侧位片和面部照片测量值与人体测量值之间的关系,以及面部照片分析是否可精确用于正畸诊断。
对300名年龄在18至25岁之间的受试者进行了一项横断面离体研究。为所有受试者获取标准化的头颅侧位片和照片,并使用Nemoceph 10.4.2(Nemotec Dental Systems,马德里,西班牙)软件程序进行分析。借助数字游标卡尺记录线性人体测量值。进行了21项线性测量,其中10项为水平测量,11项为垂直测量。采用重复测量方差分析,随后进行Bonferroni事后分析,以比较三种不同方法之间水平和垂直参数的平均值。显著性水平设定为<0.05。
大多数参数存在统计学显著差异。在类似的照片、头影测量和人体测量中,只有N'-Me'在所有三种方法中都显示出可靠性(0.53、0.53、0.53)。
照片测量法仅对少数参数被证明是一种可重复和可再现的工具。因此,它不能被视为一种可靠的诊断工具。