Mathematica Policy Research, 1100 First Street, NE, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20002, USA.
Mathematica Policy Research, 955 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 801, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jul;8(9):709-719. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0152. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
For comparative effectiveness research to achieve its purpose, providers and patients must use research evidence to make medical decisions. Therefore, this study examined factors associated with evidence-based decision-making by patients and providers. Data were collected via cross-sectional online surveys of patients (n = 603) and providers (n = 628) between November 2011 and January 2012. For both patients and providers, evidence-based medical decision-making is associated with perceptions, that is, some combination of self efficacy, attitudes and opinions. However, whereas knowledge is the most consistent factor associated with decision-making for providers, it is not associated at all for patients. Efforts to promote evidence-based medical decision-making among patients and providers should focus on skills training to improve self efficacy, and messages that highlight the benefits of patient engagement in medical decisions.
为了实现比较有效性研究的目的,提供者和患者必须使用研究证据来做出医疗决策。因此,本研究考察了与患者和提供者基于证据的决策相关的因素。数据是通过 2011 年 11 月至 2012 年 1 月期间对患者(n=603)和提供者(n=628)进行的横断面在线调查收集的。对于患者和提供者来说,基于证据的医疗决策与感知有关,即自我效能、态度和意见的某种组合。然而,尽管知识是与提供者决策最相关的因素,但与患者完全无关。促进患者和提供者进行基于证据的医疗决策的努力应侧重于技能培训以提高自我效能,并强调患者参与医疗决策的益处的信息。