Demirdöğen Şaban Oğuz, Özkaya Fatih, Cinislioğlu Ahmet Emre, Altay Mehmet Sefa, Adanur Şenol, Polat Özkan, Özbey İsa
Department of Urology, Health Science University Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Atatürk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Turk J Urol. 2019 Jul 1;45(4):254-260. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.72547. Print 2019 Jul.
To compare microscopic inguinal (MIV) and subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) surgeries with respect to efficacy and safety.
Patients who underwent varicocelectomy between January 2002 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively and prospectively. The patients who underwent varicocelectomy until December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively and the cases after January 2016 were analyzed prospectively. In our study, the married infertile male cases were compared on the basis of operation duration, number of ligated veins, number of preserved veins, postoperative pain score (visual analogue scale: VAS), patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, changes in sperm parameters, testicular consistency, pregnancy rates, and complications, such as hydrocele, testicular atrophy, and recurrence of varicocele. Surgical success rates were compared by semen analysis between unmarried infertile male cases because pregnancy rates cannot be tested. The patients were recalled for control examinations every 3 months for 1 year and tested the above-mentioned parameters. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 20 Windows Software was used for data analysis and comparison between the two groups.
The study included a total of 136 adult patients. Mean age of the patients was 28.14 (20-41) years. MSV and MIV were performed in 62 (45.6%) and 74 (54.4%) patients, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups in terms of admission duration, semen parameters within the 1-year follow-up process, hormonal changes, and complication rates. Operation duration was significantly longer in the MSV group. It was determined that a fewer number of veins were ligated, and a fewer number of veins needed to be ligated in the MIV group. The analysis of all the patients revealed that pain scores at 4 and 24 hours postoperatively were significantly statistically lower in the MSV group.
MIV and MSV are distinct, efficient, and safe surgical techniques with specific advantages and disadvantages. Their efficacy and safety rates are similar.
比较显微镜下腹股沟精索静脉结扎术(MIV)和腹股沟下精索静脉结扎术(MSV)在疗效和安全性方面的差异。
对2002年1月至2018年1月期间接受精索静脉结扎术的患者进行回顾性和前瞻性评估。对2015年12月前接受精索静脉结扎术的患者进行回顾性分析,对2016年1月后的病例进行前瞻性分析。在本研究中,对已婚不育男性病例,根据手术时间、结扎静脉数量、保留静脉数量、术后疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分法:VAS)、患者满意度、外科医生满意度、精子参数变化、睾丸质地、妊娠率以及并发症(如鞘膜积液、睾丸萎缩和精索静脉曲张复发)进行比较。对于未婚不育男性病例,通过精液分析比较手术成功率,因为无法检测妊娠率。患者在1年内每3个月召回进行对照检查,并检测上述参数。使用社会科学统计软件包第20版Windows软件进行数据分析和两组之间的比较。
该研究共纳入136例成年患者。患者的平均年龄为28.14(20 - 41)岁。分别有62例(45.6%)和74例(54.4%)患者接受了MSV和MIV手术。两组在住院时间、1年随访过程中的精液参数、激素变化和并发症发生率方面未检测到统计学上的显著差异。MSV组的手术时间明显更长。确定MIV组结扎的静脉数量更少,且需要结扎的静脉数量也更少。对所有患者的分析显示,MSV组术后4小时和24小时的疼痛评分在统计学上显著更低。
MIV和MSV是不同的、有效且安全的手术技术,各有其特定的优缺点。它们的疗效和安全率相似。