Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Boston University Master's Program in Public Health, Section of Infectious Disease, Department of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0218388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218388. eCollection 2019.
It is unclear whether sites that screen large numbers of patients for Hepatitis C Virus but achieve limited follow-up are more or less effective at having patients succeed through linkage and treatment than lower volume sites that have higher linkage percentages. The objective was to compare the rates of HCV identification, linkage to care, and treatment success between different study sites including the Emergency Department, 3 outpatient clinics with unique patients, and the inpatient setting at one medical center.
This is a descriptive analysis of 2 years of data from a protocol that integrated HCV screening and treatment into clinical services throughout multiple departments in one medical center. The program used a best practice advisory to prompt testing at all sites, with different triggers for it to fire at each site, and one central navigation program that attempted to link all patients diagnosed with hepatitis C virus to outpatient care. Outcomes included volume of tests performed in each site, Antibody and RNA rates at each site, demographic data, navigation and linkage outcomes, and post-linkage treatment completion.
28,435 patients were screened across 5 clinical locations. RNA+ rates and absolute numbers linked to MD (linkage rates among all RNA+) were: ED 7.2% RNA+, 224 (22.6%) linked; Inpatient 14.8% RNA+, 27 (17.6%) linked, General Internal Medicine 3.9% RNA+, 269 (65.8%) linked, Infectious Diseases 4.0% RNA+, 34(70.8%) linked, Family Medicine 2.0% RNA+, 28 (75.7%) linked. Demographics, linkage barriers, and treatment initiation rates were different at all sites.
Among sites there were differences in the sociodemographic characteristics of patients diagnosed with HCV, as well as differences in the success linking patients to outpatient care. At this medical center, the ED screened the most patients, the inpatient area had the highest RNA positivity rate, the FM clinic had the highest linkage rate, GIM linked the most patients by absolute number, and GIM also had the highest number of patients start treatment.
目前尚不清楚,在为丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者进行大量筛查但后续跟进有限的地点,与那些链接比例更高、但患者数量较少的地点相比,在帮助患者完成链接和治疗方面,哪种方式效果更好。本研究的目的是比较不同研究地点(包括急诊室、3 个具有独特患者群体的门诊以及一家医疗中心的住院部)之间 HCV 识别率、与护理的关联率和治疗成功率。
这是一项对一家医疗中心多个科室整合 HCV 筛查和治疗的方案进行的为期 2 年数据的描述性分析。该方案使用最佳实践建议提示所有地点进行检测,每个地点的触发因素不同,同时还设有一个中央导航方案,试图将所有被诊断为丙型肝炎病毒的患者与门诊护理联系起来。结果包括每个地点的检测量、每个地点的抗体和 RNA 率、人口统计学数据、导航和链接结果以及链接后治疗完成情况。
在 5 个临床地点共对 28435 名患者进行了筛查。RNA+率和与 MD 相关的患者数量(所有 RNA+患者的链接率)如下:ED 为 7.2% RNA+,224 例(22.6%)患者被链接;住院部为 14.8% RNA+,27 例(17.6%)患者被链接;全科医学为 3.9% RNA+,269 例(65.8%)患者被链接;传染病科为 4.0% RNA+,34 例(70.8%)患者被链接;家庭医学科为 2.0% RNA+,28 例(75.7%)患者被链接。所有地点的患者人口统计学特征、链接障碍和治疗起始率均存在差异。
在不同的研究地点中,被诊断为 HCV 的患者的社会人口学特征存在差异,而将患者与门诊护理相链接的成功率也存在差异。在这家医疗中心,ED 筛查的患者最多,住院部的 RNA 阳性率最高,家庭医学科的链接率最高,全科医学科的链接患者绝对数量最多,全科医学科开始治疗的患者人数也最多。