• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将父亲作为阴性对照暴露因素:测量偏倚的影响

Using fathers as a negative control exposure: Implications of measurement bias.

作者信息

Rita Venugopal Lekshmi, Varghese M Tom

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital Calicut, Kerala Government Health Service, India.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2020 Aug;48(6):674-675. doi: 10.1177/1403494819850895. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1177/1403494819850895
PMID:31291829
Abstract

Negative control exposure analysis is a very effective tool in evaluating the effect of unmeasured confounding in observational epidemiological studies. Several biases, including recall bias, time-varying confounding factors, measurement bias and so on, can affect the credibility of negative control exposure analysis for causal interpretations. The article focuses on the implications of differential measurement error across exposed group and negative controls to causal interpretations on negative control exposure analysis.

摘要

阴性对照暴露分析是评估观察性流行病学研究中未测量混杂因素影响的一种非常有效的工具。包括回忆偏倚、随时间变化的混杂因素、测量偏倚等在内的几种偏倚,会影响阴性对照暴露分析因果解释的可信度。本文重点探讨暴露组和阴性对照之间测量误差差异对阴性对照暴露分析因果解释的影响。

相似文献

1
Using fathers as a negative control exposure: Implications of measurement bias.将父亲作为阴性对照暴露因素:测量偏倚的影响
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Aug;48(6):674-675. doi: 10.1177/1403494819850895. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
2
Brief Report: Negative Controls to Detect Selection Bias and Measurement Bias in Epidemiologic Studies.简要报告:用于检测流行病学研究中选择偏倚和测量偏倚的阴性对照
Epidemiology. 2016 Sep;27(5):637-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000504.
3
Negative control exposure studies in the presence of measurement error: implications for attempted effect estimate calibration.存在测量误差时的阴性对照暴露研究:对尝试进行效应估计校准的影响。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):587-596. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx213.
4
Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.使用混杂函数评估二分类结局中未测量混杂的影响。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1303-1311. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx023.
5
The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.流行病学研究中残余混杂和未测量混杂的影响:一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep 15;166(6):646-55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm165. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
6
How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.在竞争风险环境中,未测量的混杂因素如何影响观察性研究中的治疗效果估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0808-7.
7
[Sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounding interference in observational study].[观察性研究中未测量混杂干扰的敏感性分析方法]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 10;40(11):1470-1475. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.11.023.
8
Estimating Bias Due to Unmeasured Confounding in Oral Health Epidemiology.口腔健康流行病学中未测量混杂因素导致的偏倚估计
Community Dent Health. 2020 Feb 27;37(1):84-89. doi: 10.1922/CDH_SpecialIssueMittinty06.
9
Using Causal Diagrams to Improve the Design and Interpretation of Medical Research.使用因果关系图改进医学研究的设计与解读
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S21-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.011.
10
Bounding formulas for selection bias.选择偏倚的界值公式。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 15;182(10):868-72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv130. Epub 2015 Oct 29.