• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高流量鼻导管治疗对极低出生体重慢性肺疾病婴儿经口喂养的影响

Impact of High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy on Oral Feeding in Very Low Birth Weight Infants with Chronic Lung Disease.

作者信息

Shimizu Daisuke, Araki Shunsuke, Kawamura Masaru, Kuwamura Mami, Suga Shutaro, Miyake Fuyu, Ichikawa Shun, Kinjo Tadamune, Kusuhara Koichi

机构信息

Center of Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.

Department of Neonatology, Fukuoka Children's Hospital.

出版信息

J UOEH. 2019;41(2):131-138. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.41.131.

DOI:10.7888/juoeh.41.131
PMID:31292356
Abstract

Previous studies on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBWIs) focused on comparing HFNC with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to determine the usefulness of HFNC as a backup in the case of extubation failure and nasal trauma; however, the studies did not consider oral feeding. This retrospective case-control study aimed at elucidating whether HFNC could prevent the delay in feeding and achievement of full oral feeding in VLBWIs with chronic lung disease (CLD). Forty five VLBWIs were enrolled in this study: an HFNC group (n = 11) that was supported by HFNC at oral feeding initiation, and a non-HFNC group (n = 34) that could start oral feeding without HFNC. The gestational age and birth weight of the HFNC group were lower than those in the non-HFNC group. The median duration of exposure to oxygen and neonatal intensive care unit stay were comparable in both groups. The timings of oral feeding initiation and full oral feeding achievement in both groups were not significantly different: 35.3 (33.0 - 38.1) vs. 35.5 (33.7 - 42.4) weeks (P = 0.91) for the HFNC and 38.6 (34.4 - 42.3) vs. 36.7 (34.6 - 44.4) weeks postmenstrual age (P = 0.29) for the non-HFNC. Clinically significant aspiration pneumonia during the period of oral feeding was not observed in the HFNC group. Respiratory support by HFNC in VLBWIs with CLD might prevent oral feeding delay. Initiation of oral feeding of VLBWIs on HFNC might be safe and might accelerate the achievement of oral feeding milestones.

摘要

以往针对极低出生体重儿(VLBWIs)使用高流量鼻导管(HFNC)的研究主要集中在比较HFNC与经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP),以确定HFNC在拔管失败和鼻外伤情况下作为备用方法的有效性;然而,这些研究未考虑经口喂养。这项回顾性病例对照研究旨在阐明HFNC是否能预防慢性肺病(CLD)的VLBWIs出现喂养延迟及实现完全经口喂养。本研究纳入了45例VLBWIs:一个HFNC组(n = 11),在开始经口喂养时接受HFNC支持;以及一个非HFNC组(n = 34),无需HFNC即可开始经口喂养。HFNC组的胎龄和出生体重低于非HFNC组。两组的吸氧中位时长和新生儿重症监护病房住院时间相当。两组开始经口喂养和实现完全经口喂养的时间无显著差异:HFNC组为35.3(33.0 - 38.1)周 vs. 35.5(33.7 - 42.4)周(P = 0.91),非HFNC组为月经龄38.6(34.4 - 42.3)周 vs. 36.7(34.6 - 44.4)周(P = 0.29)。HFNC组在经口喂养期间未观察到具有临床意义的吸入性肺炎。在患有CLD的VLBWIs中,HFNC进行呼吸支持可能会预防经口喂养延迟。在HFNC上对VLBWIs开始经口喂养可能是安全的,并且可能会加速实现经口喂养里程碑。

相似文献

1
Impact of High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy on Oral Feeding in Very Low Birth Weight Infants with Chronic Lung Disease.高流量鼻导管治疗对极低出生体重慢性肺疾病婴儿经口喂养的影响
J UOEH. 2019;41(2):131-138. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.41.131.
2
High flow nasal cannula versus NCPAP, duration to full oral feeds in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.高流量鼻导管与鼻塞式持续气道正压通气用于早产儿完全经口喂养的时长:一项随机对照试验
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jul;102(4):F329-F332. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311388. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫早产儿的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验
Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review.经鼻持续气道正压通气和高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗的婴幼儿经口喂养:系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4.
5
High Flow Nasal Cannula Use Is Associated with Increased Morbidity and Length of Hospitalization in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants.极低出生体重儿使用高流量鼻导管与发病率增加和住院时间延长相关。
J Pediatr. 2016 Jun;173:50-55.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.051. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高流量鼻导管与鼻塞持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸支持中的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jan;34(2):259-266. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1606193. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
The effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula on heart rate variability in extremely preterm infants after extubation: A randomized crossover trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气和高流量鼻导管对拔管后极早产儿心率变异性的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Jun;54(6):788-796. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24284. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Use on Neonatal Respiratory Support Patterns and Length of Stay.使用高流量鼻导管对新生儿呼吸支持模式及住院时间的影响。
Respir Care. 2016 Oct;61(10):1299-304. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04668. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
9
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study).高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)治疗婴幼儿急性病毒性毛细支气管炎的初始呼吸管理:一项多中心随机对照试验(TRAMONTANE 研究)。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4617-8. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
10
High flow nasal cannula for continuous positive airway pressure weaning in preterm neonates: A single-centre experience.高流量鼻导管用于早产儿持续气道正压通气撤机:单中心经验
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Feb;51(2):199-203. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12693. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Feeding Infants on Noninvasive Respiratory Support: Practice at One Academic Medical Center.为接受无创呼吸支持的婴儿提供喂养:一家学术医疗中心的实践
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Mar 10;34(2):617-632. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00302. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Oral feeding practices in medically complex infants receiving prolonged high-flow nasal cannula support: A retrospective cohort study.接受长期高流量鼻导管支持的复杂医学状况婴儿的经口喂养实践:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec;60(12):796-802. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16679. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Evaluating Pressure Variability and Influencing Factors during High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Premature Infants.
评估早产儿高流量鼻导管治疗期间的压力变异性及影响因素。
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;11(8):995. doi: 10.3390/children11080995.
4
Treatment of Pediatric Patients With High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Considerations for Oral Feeding: A Review of the Literature.高流量鼻导管治疗小儿患者及口腔喂养注意事项:文献综述
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022 Apr;7(2):543-552. doi: 10.1044/2021_persp-21-00152. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Safety of Bottle-Feeding Under Nasal Respiratory Support in Preterm Lambs With and Without Tachypnoea.鼻呼吸支持下早产羔羊无论有无呼吸急促时奶瓶喂养的安全性
Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 3;12:785086. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.785086. eCollection 2021.
6
Analysis of the influencing factors of the clinical effect of respiratory humidifier in treating AIDS complicated with severe Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.呼吸道湿化器治疗艾滋病合并重症耶氏肺孢子菌肺炎临床效果的影响因素分析
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):13967-13973. eCollection 2021.
7
Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review.经鼻持续气道正压通气和高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗的婴幼儿经口喂养:系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4.