• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受长期高流量鼻导管支持的复杂医学状况婴儿的经口喂养实践:一项回顾性队列研究。

Oral feeding practices in medically complex infants receiving prolonged high-flow nasal cannula support: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Cox Emily, Chawla Jasneek, Moore Madison, Schilling Sandra, Cameron Miriam, Clarke Sally, Johnstone Chelsea, Marshall Jeanne

机构信息

School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Respiratory Department, Queensland Children's Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec;60(12):796-802. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16679. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1111/jpc.16679
PMID:39344800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11616253/
Abstract

AIM

To characterise the feeding profile and care pathway for infants receiving prolonged high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support for management of a chronic condition at one facility from January to December 2021.

METHODS

Data regarding medical history, HFNC admission details (reason for HFNC, HFNC duration, flow rate), feeding outcomes and speech pathology care were collected from electronic records of HFNC-dependent infants (requiring HFNC ≥2-3 L/kg for ≥5 consecutive days). Infants with acute respiratory conditions (e.g. bronchiolitis) were excluded.

RESULTS

This study included 24 participants (median corrected age at admission 5.3 weeks, range -6 to 18.6). Of these, 15 (60%) had a condition/s that affected more than one body system (e.g. congenital diaphragmatic hernia), requiring the care of multiple specialities. Median length of HFNC use was 37.5 days (range 11-188). Twenty (83.3%) infants were referred for speech pathology (SLP) input while on HFNC support. For those referred, frequency of SLP input was variable (0-3 sessions/week), and HFNC support requirements were the most common barrier to SLP intervention (n = 9, 45%). Twelve (54.5%) infants demonstrated improvement in their primary feeding method by discharge; however, only two (9.1%) infants were discharged on full oral feeds.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates variability in oral feeding management in infants with prolonged HFNC-dependence at our centre. Respiratory support with HFNC was identified as a barrier to progressing oral feeding. Further research is required to determine if oral feeding can be safely undertaken in this cohort. This is imperative to ensure that long-term feeding outcomes are not negatively impacted by current practice.

摘要

目的

描述2021年1月至12月期间在某机构接受长期高流量鼻导管(HFNC)呼吸支持以治疗慢性病的婴儿的喂养情况和护理路径。

方法

从依赖HFNC的婴儿(连续≥5天需要HFNC≥2-3 L/kg)的电子记录中收集病史、HFNC入院详情(HFNC的原因、HFNC持续时间、流速)、喂养结果和言语病理学护理等数据。排除患有急性呼吸道疾病(如细支气管炎)的婴儿。

结果

本研究纳入了24名参与者(入院时矫正年龄中位数为5.3周,范围为-6至18.6周)。其中,15名(60%)患有影响多个身体系统的疾病(如先天性膈疝),需要多个专科的护理。HFNC使用的中位数时长为37.5天(范围为11-188天)。20名(83.3%)婴儿在接受HFNC支持期间被转介接受言语病理学(SLP)干预。对于那些被转介的婴儿,SLP干预的频率各不相同(0-3次/周),而HFNC支持需求是SLP干预最常见的障碍(n=9,45%)。12名(54.5%)婴儿在出院时主要喂养方式有所改善;然而,只有2名(9.1%)婴儿出院时完全经口喂养。

结论

本研究表明,在我们中心,长期依赖HFNC的婴儿在经口喂养管理方面存在差异。HFNC呼吸支持被认为是经口喂养进展的障碍。需要进一步研究以确定该队列中的婴儿是否可以安全地进行经口喂养。这对于确保长期喂养结果不受当前做法的负面影响至关重要。

相似文献

1
Oral feeding practices in medically complex infants receiving prolonged high-flow nasal cannula support: A retrospective cohort study.接受长期高流量鼻导管支持的复杂医学状况婴儿的经口喂养实践:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec;60(12):796-802. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16679. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.经鼻高流量湿化氧疗在足月儿呼吸支持中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 4;8(8):CD011010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011010.pub2.
3
High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis.高流量鼻导管治疗小儿毛细支气管炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 20;3(3):CD009609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009609.pub3.
4
Infants with bronchiolitis with high-flow nasal cannula in the paediatric ward. Is there a role for the ROXi (respiratory rate-oxygenation index) in predicting failure of high-flow nasal cannula?儿科病房中接受高流量鼻导管治疗的毛细支气管炎婴儿。呼吸频率-氧合指数(ROXi)在预测高流量鼻导管治疗失败方面是否有作用?
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 6;184(7):396. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06206-5.
5
High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis.高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法治疗小儿毛细支气管炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 20;2014(1):CD009609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009609.pub2.
6
High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.用于早产儿呼吸支持的高流量鼻导管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2(2):CD006405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub3.
7
Application of the TIDieR checklist to improve the HFNC use in bronchiolitis management.应用TIDieR清单改善毛细支气管炎管理中高流量鼻导管吸氧的使用情况。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 17;184(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05880-1.
8
Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.以无创呼吸支持作为主要模式用于早产儿:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD014895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014895.pub2.
9
Does less invasive surfactant administration during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen treatment reduce the need for invasive ventilation in late preterm and early term born infants with respiratory distress? A study protocol for a single-centre study with a treatment and control arm.在高流量鼻导管给氧治疗期间,采用侵入性较小的表面活性剂给药方式,是否能减少晚期早产儿和早期足月儿呼吸窘迫时的有创通气需求?一项有治疗组和对照组的单中心研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 23;15(6):e089399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089399.
10
High-flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support in adult intensive care patients.用于成人重症监护患者呼吸支持的高流量鼻导管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 30;5(5):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Pediatric Patients With High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Considerations for Oral Feeding: A Review of the Literature.高流量鼻导管治疗小儿患者及口腔喂养注意事项:文献综述
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2022 Apr;7(2):543-552. doi: 10.1044/2021_persp-21-00152. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Milk Flow Rates From Bottle Nipples: What We Know and Why It Matters.奶瓶奶嘴的奶流速度:我们所知道的以及为何重要。
Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Jun;25(3):229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Prevalence of problematic feeding in young children born prematurely: a meta-analysis.
早产儿幼儿中存在问题性喂养的流行情况:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02574-7.
4
Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high flow nasal cannula: a systematic review.经鼻持续气道正压通气和高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗的婴幼儿经口喂养:系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02531-4.
5
Comparison of Continuous positive airway pressure versus High flow nasal cannula for Oral feeding Preterm infants (CHOmP): randomized pilot study.持续气道正压通气与高流量鼻导管吸氧用于经口喂养早产儿(CHOmP)的比较:随机先导研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(5):951-957. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1735339. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
6
The effects of oral feeding while on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants.经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)时经口喂养对早产儿的影响。
J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;40(6):909-915. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0632-2. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
7
Enteral hydration in high-flow therapy for infants with bronchiolitis: Secondary analysis of a randomised trial.毛细支气管炎婴儿高流量治疗中的肠内补液:一项随机试验的二次分析
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jun;56(6):950-955. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14799. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice.经鼻持续气道正压通气和高流量鼻导管呼吸支持患儿的口腔喂养:实践调查。
Dysphagia. 2020 Jun;35(3):443-454. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10047-4. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
9
Impact of High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy on Oral Feeding in Very Low Birth Weight Infants with Chronic Lung Disease.高流量鼻导管治疗对极低出生体重慢性肺疾病婴儿经口喂养的影响
J UOEH. 2019;41(2):131-138. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.41.131.
10
Oral Nutrition in Children With Bronchiolitis on High-Flow Nasal Cannula Is Well Tolerated.患有细支气管炎且使用高流量鼻导管的儿童对口服营养耐受性良好。
Hosp Pediatr. 2017 May;7(5):249-255. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2016-0131.