Micro & Nanomédecines Translationelles-MINT, UNIV Angers, INSERM U1066, CNRS UMR 6021, UBL Universite Bretagne Loire, Angers F-49933, France.
Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CERMN - EA 4258, FR CNRS 3038 INC3M, SF 4206 ICORE, Caen, France.
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2019 Jul;14(13):1647-1662. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2018-0337. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
Over the last decade, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have emerged as a promising alternative for the treatment of various infections. The aim of this work is to explore the potential of lipid nanocapsules for the delivery of AMPs. Three approaches were compared in terms of encapsulation efficiency, peptide activity and protection against proteases: peptide encapsulation, surface adsorption or covalent attachment of three selected AMPs. A potentiation of the antimicrobial activity and a partial protection of the peptides after adsorption were demonstrated compared with native peptides. Conversely, encapsulation allowed better peptide stability, correlated with higher encapsulation efficiencies and a preservation of the activity. Finally, the covalent attachment strategy turned out to be less conclusive due to peptide inactivation. In brief, a lipid nanocapsule-based platform appears suitable to deliver AMPs.
在过去的十年中,抗菌肽 (AMPs) 作为治疗各种感染的一种有前途的替代方法而出现。本工作旨在探索脂质纳米胶囊在 AMPs 递送上的潜力。在包封效率、肽活性和对蛋白酶的保护方面比较了三种方法:肽包封、三种选定 AMPs 的表面吸附或共价附着。与天然肽相比,吸附后表现出抗菌活性的增强和肽的部分保护。相反,包封允许更好的肽稳定性,与更高的包封效率相关,并保持活性。最后,由于肽失活,共价附着策略的结果不太确定。总之,基于脂质纳米胶囊的平台似乎适合递送 AMPs。