Suppr超能文献

术前应激试验在非心脏手术患者评估中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Medical Campus, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219145. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-operative stress testing is widely used to evaluate patients for non-cardiac surgeries. However, its value in predicting peri-operative mortality is uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the type and quality of available evidence in a comprehensive and statistically rigorous evaluation regarding the effectiveness of pre-operative stress testing in reducing 30-day post -operative mortality following non -cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (from inception to January 27, 2016) were searched for all studies in English. We included studies with pre-operative stress testing prior to 10 different non-cardiac surgery among adults and excluded studies with sample size<15. The data on study characteristics, methodology and outcomes were extracted independently by two observers and checked by two other observers. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in two-group comparison and pooled the rates for stress test alone. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and methodological quality of studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The predefined protocol was registered in PROSPERO #CRD42016049212.

RESULTS

From 1807 abstracts, 79 studies were eligible (297,534 patients): 40 had information on 30-day mortality, of which 6 studies compared stress test versus no stress test. The risk of 30-day mortality was not significant in the comparison of stress testing versus none (RR: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.35-1.80) along with weak evidence for heterogeneity. For the studies that evaluated stress testing without a comparison group, the pooled rates are 1.98% (95% CI = 1.25-2.85) with a high heterogeneity. There was evidence of potential publication bias and small study effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial interest and research over the past 40 years to predict 30-day mortality risk among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, the current body of evidence is insufficient to derive a definitive conclusion as to whether stress testing leads to reduced peri-operative mortality.

摘要

背景

术前应激测试广泛用于评估非心脏手术患者。然而,其预测围手术期死亡率的价值尚不确定。本研究的目的是评估综合和严格统计学评估中可用证据的类型和质量,以评估术前应激测试在降低非心脏手术后 30 天术后死亡率方面的有效性。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库(从建立到 2016 年 1 月 27 日)中的所有英文研究。我们纳入了 10 种不同成人非心脏手术术前应激测试的研究,并排除了样本量<15 的研究。两名观察者独立提取研究特征、方法和结果数据,并由另外两名观察者进行检查。主要结局为 30 天死亡率。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以估计两组比较的相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI),并对单独进行应激测试的结果进行了汇总。使用 I2 评估异质性,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表评估研究的方法学质量。预定义的方案已在 PROSPERO #CRD42016049212 中注册。

结果

从 1807 篇摘要中,有 79 项研究符合条件(297534 名患者):40 项研究提供了 30 天死亡率信息,其中 6 项研究比较了应激测试与无应激测试。应激测试与无应激测试相比,30 天死亡率无显著差异(RR:0.79,95%CI=0.35-1.80),且存在弱异质性证据。对于未与对照组进行比较的应激测试研究,汇总率为 1.98%(95%CI=1.25-2.85),存在高度异质性。存在潜在的发表偏倚和小样本效应的证据。

结论

尽管在过去 40 年中,人们对预测非心脏手术患者 30 天死亡率风险产生了浓厚的兴趣并进行了大量研究,但目前的证据不足以得出应激测试是否会降低围手术期死亡率的明确结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/027c/6622497/6bdab3d8c1c0/pone.0219145.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验