Lucchina Stefano, Fusetti Cesare, Guidi Marco
Locarno Hand Center, Switzerland.
Regional Hospital La Carità, Locarno, Switzerland.
Hand (N Y). 2021 May;16(3):385-390. doi: 10.1177/1558944719857816. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
The measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) is a diagnostic tool to detect entrapments syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome in elbows undergoing endoscopic and "in situ" open cubital tunnel release for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) using ultrasound-related changes in the largest CSA of the ulnar nerve. The purpose is to determine the association between clinical outcome and CSA. From May 2011 to April 2016, 60 patients with CuTS were prospectively followed and not randomly divided in two groups: 30 patients undergoing an endoscopic release (ER) and 30 patients with "in situ" open neurolysis (OR). A sonographic examination was performed by the senior authors at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgical decompression. CSA values were statistically significantly lower in the ER. Hand grip strength difference with Jamar test was not statistically significant a 12 months (39 kg vs 27 kg). Static-2 point discrimination test difference was only statistically significant lower in the endoscopic group at 3, 6 and 12 months but not clinically relevant (5 mm vs 6 mm). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (ASES-e) function score, ASES-e Pain score, and ASES-e Satisfaction score were not statistically significant different between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months post operatively. The study confirms that in spite of lower values of CSA in the ER, there is not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques in terms of subjective outcomes. Ultrasound (US) measurements seem to have a limited value in clinical results of patients treated for entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve. Prognostic Level III.
横截面积(CSA)的测量是检测卡压综合征的一种诊断工具。本研究的目的是比较采用超声测量尺神经最大CSA的相关变化,对接受内镜下和“原位”开放性肘管松解术治疗肘管综合征(CuTS)的肘部临床疗效。目的是确定临床疗效与CSA之间的关联。2011年5月至2016年4月,对60例CuTS患者进行前瞻性随访,非随机分为两组:30例行内镜松解术(ER),30例行“原位”开放性神经松解术(OR)。由资深作者在基线以及手术减压后3、6和12个月进行超声检查。ER组的CSA值在统计学上显著更低。Jamar握力测试中握力差异在12个月时无统计学意义(39 kg对27 kg)。静态两点辨别觉测试差异仅在内镜组3、6和12个月时在统计学上显著更低,但无临床相关性(5 mm对6 mm)。美国肩肘外科医师协会肘部问卷(ASES-e)功能评分、ASES-e疼痛评分和ASES-e满意度评分在术后3、6和12个月时两组间无统计学显著差异。该研究证实,尽管ER组的CSA值较低,但两种技术在主观疗效方面无统计学显著差异。超声(US)测量在尺神经卡压性神经病患者的临床结果中似乎价值有限。预后水平为III级。