Hill Troy D, Sommer Nathalie R, Kanaskie Caroline R, Santos Emily A, Oczkowski Autumn J
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 27 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI 02882, United States.
Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 205 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States.
J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2018;21:466-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2018.07.006.
Salt marshes have the potential to intercept nitrogen that could otherwise impact coastal water quality. Salt marsh plants play a central role in nutrient interception by retaining N in above- and belowground tissues. We examine N uptake and allocation in two dominant salt marsh plants, short-form and . Nitrogen uptake was measured using N tracer experiments conducted over a four-week period, supplemented with stem-level growth rates, primary production, and microbial denitrification assays. By varying experiment duration, we identify the importance of a rarely-measured aspect of experimental design in N tracer studies. Experiment duration had a greater impact on quantitative N uptake estimates than primary production or stem-level relative growth rates. Rapid initial scavenging of added N caused apparent nitrogen uptake rates to decline by a factor of two as experiment duration increased from one week to one month, although each experiment shared the qualitative conclusion that roots scavenged N approximately twice as rapidly as . We estimate total N uptake into above- and belowground tissues as 154 and 277 mg N·m·d for and , respectively. Driving this pattern were higher N content in leaves and belowground tissue and strong differences in primary production; and produced 8.8 and 14.7 g biomass·m·d. Denitrification potentials were similar in sediment associated with both species, but the strong species-specific difference in N uptake suggests that -dominated marshes are likely to intercept more N from coastal waters than are short-form marshes. The data and source code for this manuscript are available as an R package from https://github.com/troyhill/NitrogenUptake2016.
盐沼有拦截氮的潜力,否则这些氮可能会影响沿海水质。盐沼植物通过在地上和地下组织中保留氮,在养分拦截中发挥核心作用。我们研究了两种主要盐沼植物短叶和的氮吸收与分配情况。通过为期四周的氮示踪实验测量氮吸收,并辅以茎水平生长速率、初级生产力和微生物反硝化测定。通过改变实验持续时间,我们确定了氮示踪研究中一个很少被测量的实验设计方面的重要性。实验持续时间对氮吸收定量估计的影响大于初级生产力或茎水平相对生长速率。随着实验持续时间从一周增加到一个月,添加氮的快速初始清除导致表观氮吸收速率下降了两倍,尽管每个实验都有定性结论,即短叶根清除氮的速度大约是另一种植物的两倍。我们估计地上和地下组织的总氮吸收量分别为短叶154毫克氮·米·天和另一种植物277毫克氮·米·天。造成这种模式的原因是另一种植物叶片和地下组织中的氮含量较高以及初级生产力存在显著差异;短叶和另一种植物的日生物量产量分别为8.8克和14.7克。两种植物相关沉积物中的反硝化潜力相似,但氮吸收中强烈的物种特异性差异表明,以另一种植物为主的盐沼可能比短叶盐沼从沿海水域拦截更多的氮。本手稿的数据和源代码可作为R包从https://github.com/troyhill/NitrogenUptake2016获取。