Suppr超能文献

催眠暗示与经颅直流电刺激对疼痛感知及下行疼痛调节系统影响的比较:一项交叉随机临床试验

Comparison of Hypnotic Suggestion and Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Effects on Pain Perception and the Descending Pain Modulating System: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Beltran Serrano Gerardo, Rodrigues Laura Pooch, Schein Bruno, Souza Andressa, Torres Iraci L S, da Conceição Antunes Luciana, Fregni Felipe, Caumo Wolnei

机构信息

Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Pain and Palliative Care Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2019 Jun 26;13:662. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00662. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

This paper aims to determine if hypnotic analgesia suggestion and transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) have a differential effect on pain perception. We hypothesized that transcranial direct-current stimulation would be more effective than hypnotic analgesia suggestion at changing the descending pain modulating system, whereas the hypnotic suggestion would have a greater effect in quantitative sensory testing. This is a randomized, double blind and crossover trial. All stages of this clinical trial were performed at the Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Were included 24 healthy females aged from 18 to 45 years old, with a high susceptibility to hypnosis, according to the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C (15). The subjects received a random and crossover transcranial direct-current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (2 mA for 20 min) and hypnotic analgesia (20 min). Only hypnotic suggestion produced changes that are statistically significant from pre- to post-intervention in the following outcomes measures: heat pain threshold, heat pain tolerance, cold pressure test, and serum brain-derivate-neurotrophic-factor. The analysis showed a significant main effect for treatment ( = 4.32; = 0.04) when we compared the delta-(Δ) of conditioned pain modulation task between the transcranial direct-current stimulation and hypnotic suggestion groups. Also, the change in the brain-derivate-neurotrophic-factor was positively correlated with the conditioned pain modulation task. The results confirm a differential effect between hypnotic suggestion and transcranial direct-current stimulation on the pain measures. They suggest that the impact of the interventions has differential neural mechanisms, since the hypnotic suggestion improved pain perception, whereas the transcranial direct-current stimulation increased inhibition of the descending pain modulating system. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03744897. These findings highlight the effect of hypnotic suggestion on contra-regulating mechanisms involved in pain perception, while the transcranial direct-current stimulation increased inhibition of the descending pain modulating system. They could help clinicians comprehend the mechanisms involved in hypnotic analgesia and transcranial direct-current stimulation and thus may contribute to pain and disability management.

摘要

本文旨在确定催眠镇痛暗示和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对疼痛感知是否有不同影响。我们假设,在改变下行疼痛调节系统方面,经颅直流电刺激比催眠镇痛暗示更有效,而催眠暗示在定量感觉测试中效果更显著。这是一项随机、双盲和交叉试验。该临床试验的所有阶段均在阿雷格里港临床医院疼痛与神经调节实验室进行。根据滑铁卢 - 斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型(15),纳入了24名年龄在18至45岁之间、对催眠高度敏感的健康女性。受试者接受了在背外侧前额叶皮层上的随机交叉经颅直流电刺激(2毫安,持续20分钟)和催眠镇痛(20分钟)。只有催眠暗示在以下结局指标中产生了从干预前到干预后具有统计学意义的变化:热痛阈值、热痛耐受性、冷压试验和血清脑源性神经营养因子。当我们比较经颅直流电刺激组和催眠暗示组之间条件性疼痛调节任务的差值(Δ)时,分析显示治疗有显著的主效应(F = 4.32;P = 0.04)。此外,脑源性神经营养因子的变化与条件性疼痛调节任务呈正相关。结果证实了催眠暗示和经颅直流电刺激在疼痛测量方面存在不同影响。它们表明,这些干预措施的影响具有不同的神经机制,因为催眠暗示改善了疼痛感知,而经颅直流电刺激增强了对下行疼痛调节系统的抑制。ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT03744897。这些发现突出了催眠暗示对参与疼痛感知的反调节机制的影响,而经颅直流电刺激增强了对下行疼痛调节系统的抑制。它们可以帮助临床医生理解催眠镇痛和经颅直流电刺激所涉及的机制,从而可能有助于疼痛和残疾管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/126c/6608544/428cbb2cee6d/fnins-13-00662-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验