Kramer Sybille, Zims Rolf, Simang Michael, Rüger Linda, Irnich Dominik
Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Dec 15;14:496. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-496.
Many studies show an effectiveness of hypnotic analgesia. It has been discussed whether the analgesic effect is mainly caused by the relaxation that is concomitant to hypnosis. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of hypnotic relaxation suggestion on different somatosensory detection and pain thresholds.
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measurements were performed before and during hypnosis in twenty-three healthy subjects on the dorsum of the right hand. Paired t-test was used to compare threshold changes. The influence of hypnotic susceptibility was evaluated by calculating correlation coefficients for threshold changes and hypnotic susceptibility (Harvard group scale).
During hypnosis significantly changed somatosensory thresholds (reduced function) were observed for the following sensory detection thresholds: Cold Detection Threshold (CDT), Warm Detection Threshold (WDT), Thermal Sensory Limen (TSL) and Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT). The only unchanged sensory detection threshold was Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT). No significant changes were observed for the determined pain detection thresholds (Cold Pain Thresholds, Heat Pain Thresholds, Mechanical Pain Sensitivity, Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia, Wind-up Ratio and Pressure Pain Threshold). No correlation of hypnotic susceptibility and threshold changes were detected.
Hypnotic relaxation without a specific analgesic suggestion results in thermal and mechanical detection, but not pain threshold changes. We thus conclude that a relaxation suggestion has no genuine effect on sensory pain thresholds.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02261155 (9th October 2014).
许多研究表明催眠镇痛有效。关于镇痛效果是否主要由与催眠相伴的放松引起一直存在讨论。本研究旨在评估催眠放松暗示对不同躯体感觉检测和疼痛阈值的影响。
对23名健康受试者右手背在催眠前及催眠期间进行定量感觉测试(QST)测量。采用配对t检验比较阈值变化。通过计算阈值变化与催眠易感性(哈佛群体量表)的相关系数来评估催眠易感性的影响。
在催眠期间,观察到以下感觉检测阈值的躯体感觉阈值有显著变化(功能降低):冷觉检测阈值(CDT)、温觉检测阈值(WDT)、温度感觉阈(TSL)和机械感觉检测阈值(MDT)。唯一未改变的感觉检测阈值是振动觉检测阈值(VDT)。所测定的疼痛检测阈值(冷痛阈值、热痛阈值、机械性疼痛敏感性、动态机械性异常性疼痛、累加比率和压力疼痛阈值)未观察到显著变化。未检测到催眠易感性与阈值变化之间的相关性。
无特定镇痛暗示的催眠放松会导致热觉和机械觉检测变化,但不会导致疼痛阈值变化。因此我们得出结论,放松暗示对感觉性疼痛阈值没有真正影响。
ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT02261155(2014年10月9日)。