Cochran J S, Robinson S N, Crane V S, Jones D G
Department of Urology, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas.
Postgrad Med. 1988 May 1;83(6):199-204. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1988.11700266.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of urolithiasis, but its success depends in part upon minimizing potential sequelae. Although ESWL is safe, effective, and relatively economical, one complication can be urosepsis, resulting from liberation of bacteria when the stones disintegrate. Patients who are at increased risk of infection are those who have existing urinary tract infection; perioperative urologic manipulation; infected stones; predisposition for infectious endocarditis; or multiple, large, or complex stones. If urosepsis occurs, it usually requires prolonged hospitalization, which obviates any cost-benefits that can be accrued from ESWL. Prophylactic use of an antibiotic before ESWL is rational and cost-effective. Ideally, the antibiotic should possess a spectrum of activity against the most likely bacteria to be encountered, require a limited number of doses, and offer the flexibility of sustained coverage in the event that the procedure is delayed. Our experience at Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas supports the use of a long-acting cephalosporin for the prevention of infections following ESWL.
体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)有可能彻底改变尿石症的治疗方法,但其成功部分取决于将潜在后遗症降至最低。虽然ESWL安全、有效且相对经济,但一种并发症可能是尿脓毒症,这是由于结石分解时细菌释放所致。感染风险增加的患者包括患有现有尿路感染的患者;围手术期泌尿外科操作;感染性结石;感染性心内膜炎易感性;或多发性、大的或复杂的结石。如果发生尿脓毒症,通常需要延长住院时间,这会抵消ESWL可能带来的任何成本效益。在ESWL前预防性使用抗生素是合理且具有成本效益的。理想情况下,抗生素应具有针对最可能遇到的细菌的活性谱,需要有限的剂量,并在手术延迟的情况下提供持续覆盖的灵活性。我们在达拉斯长老会医院的经验支持使用长效头孢菌素预防ESWL后的感染。